Search for: "Does 1 - 29"
Results 6941 - 6960
of 13,856
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2015, 1:00 am
These will be handed down in Court 1 from 9.45am. [read post]
29 Nov 2015, 6:24 pm
Usually this is calculated at roughly one month of notice per year of employment up to 2 years maximum, though most low-skill or non-professional vocations would be capped at 1 year. [read post]
29 Nov 2015, 10:46 am
What does all this mean for you? [read post]
28 Nov 2015, 4:07 pm
The judgment [pdf] was handed down on 1 June 2015, and reversed and remanded the Third Circuit. [read post]
28 Nov 2015, 8:19 am
How does the music industry expect people to uphold such a stupid law? [read post]
26 Nov 2015, 8:28 am
NEW YORK SALES TAX This scenario does not involve gifting, which has its own tax liability. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 2:51 pm
MayoDetails at http://www.maryrobinsoncentre.ie/events.htmlSat. 28 Nov. 2015:Current Legal Challenges Facing Primary School Management - Law School, Trinity College Dublinhttp://www.tcd.ie/Law/events/2015/primary-schools-legal-challenges.phpMon. 30 Nov. 2015:Direct Democracy Considered – Irish, Scottish, Swiss, and Transnational European Perspectives on the Use of Referendums, Quinn School of Business, UCDDetails at http://www.ucd.ie/law/eventsseminars/title,260230,en.htmlTue.… [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 8:18 am
Such legal protection implies no obligation to design devices, products, components or services to correspond to technological measures, so long as such device, product, component or service does not otherwise fall under the prohibition of Article 6. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 2:40 pm
* When does a broadcasting organisation not communicate works to the public? [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 12:45 pm
While it has not been made out that the plaintiff has invoked Rule 15-1 specifically to defeat the defendants’ jury notice, it is fair to conclude that, in the circumstances, using fast track procedures would negatively impact the defendants more than it would positively assist the plaintiff or advance the purposes of Rule 15-1. [29] In my view, taking all these factors into account, it is fair to conclude that Rule… [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 10:33 am
On September 29 the decision to terminate Mr. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 3:44 am
§1003.2(b)(1); see 8 U.S. [read post]
21 Nov 2015, 6:44 am
Fulghum 15-244Issue: Whether the “fraud or concealment” exception to the statute of repose found in 29 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 11:38 pm
In the In re Bea opinion published on May 29, 2015, this court determined that a person filing a Chapter 13 does not necessarily have to start making payments to secured creditors immediately after the filing of their case as long as those creditors do not object to the payments as proposed. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 2:53 am
’Yesterday the Ninth Chamber of the CJEU ruled thus (with the main message in bold):Article 3(1) of Directive 2001/29 ... must be interpreted as meaning that a broadcasting organisation does not carry out an act of communication to the public, within the meaning of that provision, when it transmits its programme-carrying signals exclusively to signal distributors without those signals being accessible to the public during, and as a result of that transmission, those… [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 2:36 am
This case concerned the right of communication to the public within Article 3(1) of Directive 2001/29 (the InfoSoc Directive) as applied to TV programmes transmitted via direct injection. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 9:02 pm
Minaya, supra, 54 N.Y.2d at 365, 445 N.Y.S.2d 690, 429 N.E.2d 1161; 29 N.Y.Jur.2d, Courts and Judges, § 463. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 6:08 am
” As of today, the FDA does not object to the use of the term if the food does not contain added color, artificial flavors or synthetic substances. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 6:08 am
” As of today, the FDA does not object to the use of the term if the food does not contain added color, artificial flavors or synthetic substances. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 6:41 am
It’s a familiar libertarian insight that regulation often holds government itself to lower standards than it does private actors. [read post]
