Search for: "EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT" Results 6941 - 6960 of 22,338
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Sep 2019, 3:38 pm by Gordon Ahl
President Trump addressed the 74th session of the U.N. [read post]
When Congress passes an article of impeachment, it makes a statement about the nature of offenses that justify removal from office. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 7:08 am by Samuel Bray
Circuit's injunction had greatly interfered with executive action, observing that "[i]n this vital industry, by action of the [D.C. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 6:37 am by David Post
  I have to believe that there are still some Republican office-holders who will finally say: This is over the line. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 11:27 am by Margaret Taylor
Lewandowski’s conversations with the President and with senior advisers to the President are protected from disclosure by long-settled principles protecting executive branch confidentiality interests and, as a result, the White Hou [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 9:30 am by Jacob Schulz, William Ford
The committee will hear testimony from William Braniff, the director of the national consortium for the study of terrorism and responses to terrorism; Clinton Watts, a distinguished research fellow at the Foreign Policy Research Institute; Robert Chesney, the director of the Robert Strauss Center for International Security and Law at the University of Texas at Austin; and George Selim, the senior vice president for national programs at the Anti-Defamation League. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 6:57 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
In a prior court ruling in this case, the Court summarized the allegations as follows:On September 3, 2015, plaintiffs assembled in front of the Manhattan office of Republican Party Presidential candidate Donald J. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 1:17 pm by Robert S. Litt
OLC opinions are considered to be binding and authoritative interpretations of law within the executive branch. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 12:06 pm by Benjamin Wittes
— Jack Goldsmith (@jacklgoldsmith) September 19, 2019 13/ These are super-hard problems, but I fear that the attacks on presidential secrecy here are (in Jackson’s words) “confusing the issue of a power's validity with the cause it is invoked to promote, of confounding the permanent executive office with its temporary occupant. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 12:05 pm by Neoshia Roemer
Executive Assistant to the Associate Dean, East Lansing, M.I. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 3:58 am by China Law Blog
They have been acclaimed by many observers in large part because they are presided over by specialized IP judges. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Ricardo Rosselló signed an executive order to create a lobbyist registry and establish the “code of total transparency” for all agency heads within the executive branch. [read post]
” Similarly, the New York statutes invoked in the complaint, New York Executive Law § 63(12) and New York General Business Law §§ 349-50, provide that corporate officers and directors “may be held liable for fraud if they participate in it or have actual knowledge of it. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 1:25 am by CMS
  He adds that the Lord President commented that an affidavit is not required in these circumstances. 1414: Lord Keen QC moves on to discuss the decision of the Inner House. 1413: Lord Keen QC tells the court this is “forbidden territory” and is a matter between Parliament and the Executive. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 9:52 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Stark is President of John Reed Stark Consulting and former Chief of the SEC’s Office of Internet Enforcement. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 12:03 pm by Gordon Ahl
  ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Margaret Taylor analyzed the facts of the House whistleblower standoff and the historical relationship between the legislative and executive branch on intelligence community whistleblowers. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 9:37 am by Margaret Taylor
” Schiff surmised that it was fair to conclude that it involves the president, or people around the president or both. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 9:37 am by Robert Litt
The executive branch has always maintained that it does not consider the statutory language mandatory. [read post]