Search for: "EXPENSE OF JUDGES" Results 6941 - 6960 of 24,984
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2015, 4:57 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
It’s an iterative process, endless rollercoaster of expensive litigation. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 2:03 am
To this the judge responded that although it is usual, it is not set in stone that the trial would be split. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 7:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
First, wind-down authority exists only where immediate compliance would lead to extreme harms that clearly and overwhelmingly outweigh the harms of non-compliance; mere inconvenience or expense does not suffice. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 1:01 pm by Joe Mullin
A federal judge threw out nearly all of the claims against Greenpeace, including all RICO claims, in 2019. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 12:00 am
Big firms cut loose expensive lawyers. [read post]
13 Feb 2006, 12:23 pm by Unknown
Judge Isgur notes that the statute itself does not address what standard of proof applies in determining whether the presumption factors exist, and which party has the burden. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 10:00 pm by Elizabeth A. Bokermann, Esquire
 It is important that the judge view you as a polite, respectful and even-tempered person. [read post]
27 Aug 2017, 7:36 am by Gritsforbreakfast
" And that's cheaper and easier for them, but I think that making it more expensive to make that choice might make a big difference. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 12:00 am
Fines reaching into four figures will be imposed and your vehicle is impounded for 30 days at your expense. [read post]
5 Jul 2014, 4:54 pm
Eckford ultimate receiving just under $310,000 after commissions and other expenses. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 4:36 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Rather than pay for a bail bond, they can use their money to pay for an attorney so the county doesn’t have to appoint one at taxpayer expense. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 4:51 am by David DePaolo
"Chief Workers' Compensation Judge David Langham in his blog post this morning asks, "What IS IT? [read post]
1 May 2016, 4:06 pm
Your testimony will, as a result, necessarily be very limited, as you will only be afforded an opportunity to present to the judge the facts most important to the issue that you are asking the judge to resolve that day. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 5:04 am by Florian Mueller
It is not a recipe for commercial chaos as the defendants would have it, but it does encourage expensive parallel litigation in several jurisdictions and more uncertainty than is necessary. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 12:00 am
Big firms cut loose expensive lawyers. [read post]