Search for: "In re F. E."
Results 6941 - 6960
of 7,242
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2007, 7:45 am
But why are we making such a big deal of these briefs, you might ask (especially if you're not a litigator). [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 12:33 am
Do it well, and much of the fog hiding the hazards of e-discovery lifts. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 8:46 pm
David Giacalone at f/k/a had a beautiful post yesterday suggesting haiku books we all might give as holiday gifts. [read post]
23 Nov 2007, 2:30 pm
"none":"block";a.left=e+"px";a.top=d+"px"}k.tg=function(a){var e=0,d,b,h,f=0,g=window.navExtra;! [read post]
23 Nov 2007, 3:21 am
Osborne, Q.C.D'emblée, je dois dire que je me félicites du caractère progressiste de cette initiative et de son résultat préliminaire. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 10:17 am
The transcript redaction procedures will likely be re-urged within the next couple of months. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 1:31 pm
BSA's own internal "Ineligible Volunteer Files" (also called "the confidential records"), records it collected and maintained in secrecy for seventy years, reveal that scouting is a pedophile "magnet" and that removed pedophiles were often able to re-enter scouting in other locations. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 1:19 pm
Failed to conduct background checks on new or existing scouting leaders, or more carefully screen scout leaders who did not then have and never had sons in Scouting; e. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 12:04 am
As a result of the settlement, the parties stated the suit by Anthony F. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 11:43 am
Sept. 7, 2007) Magistrate Judge Randolph F. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
Tilton, 465 F. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 2:17 am
You have no idea where you're going or what you'll do when you get there, but it's definitely spontaneous and sounds like fun. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 9:33 am
., - - - F.3d - - - (9th Cir. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 4:09 am
United States, 183 F.3d 812 (8th Cir.1999) (grandfathering transfer), with E. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 6:08 am
In re Perrotta, 2007 WL 3307256 (Bankr. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 3:00 am
Carter, 284 F.3d 411, 418 (2d Cir.2002) (holding that § 1997e(e) does not bar recovery for nominal and punitive damages); Allah v. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 1:25 am
Applying these standards, federal courts have found that the following positions are “safety sensitive” such that random drug testing should be permitted: a) air traffic controllers; b) aircraft maintenance personnel; c) railroad safety inspectors; d) highway and motor carrier safety specialists; e) lock and dam operators; f) heavy equipment operators (e.g., forklift, tractor and crane operators). [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 1:25 am
Applying these standards, federal courts have found that the following positions are “safety sensitive” such that random drug testing should be permitted: a) air traffic controllers; b) aircraft maintenance personnel; c) railroad safety inspectors; d) highway and motor carrier safety specialists; e) lock and dam operators; f) heavy equipment operators (e.g., forklift, tractor and crane operators). [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 5:20 am
In re Alvarez, 224 F.3d 1273, 1277 (11th Cir. 2000), Fla. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 9:44 pm
""Get the f---ing e-mails! [read post]
