Search for: "Line v. State"
Results 6941 - 6960
of 28,122
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2019, 8:14 am
” The name derives from Auer v. [read post]
5 Jul 2008, 6:52 pm
Co. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 1:27 pm
ShareAs expected, Wednesday’s argument in Jack Daniel’s Properties v VIP Products showcased the justices grappling with line-drawing. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 8:45 am
The court equally rejected the second objection that its solution manifested an alternative form of gender discrimination because claimants through the female line would be released from the registration condition whereas claimants through the male line under the previous law were not. [read post]
22 May 2017, 3:01 pm
Alabama and Alabama Democratic Conference v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 11:35 am
The challengers had also made a second argument: Under the Supreme Court’s 1970 decision in Pike v. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 3:04 pm
(2) Does the ICCTA preempt a state agency’s voluntary commitments to comply with CEQA as a condition of receiving state funds for a state owned rail line and/or leasing state-owned property? [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 11:58 am
United States Telecom Ass'n v. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
Ct. 2466 (2013), and PLIVA v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:07 am
Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division's ruling states:"The article 78 court correctly determined, upon consideration of all the facts, that respondents' denial of petitioner's application for reinstatement to his former position with NYCHA was not arbitrary and capricious or an abuse of discretion (see Matter of Roberts v Gavin, 96 AD3d 669, 671 [1st Dept 2012]). [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 11:42 am
Yet, in Fernandez v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 8:10 am
See Utilities Comm. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 4:30 am
Williams, Schenck v. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 7:31 am
Phelps and United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 7:37 am
United States, and, of course, NFIB v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 6:33 am
American Needle v. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 9:57 am
“The executive power shall be vested in a governor” proclaims Article V, Section 1 of the Wisconsin Constitution. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 12:37 pm
State as well as Beaugureau v. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 11:25 am
Early litigation focused on the equal protection clause, a nod to the “one person, one vote” line of cases after Baker v. [read post]
