Search for: "Mark" Results 6941 - 6960 of 151,817
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2022, 3:55 am
" The purported mark is molded into the bottom of applicant's water bottles (see photo below right) and there was no evidence that purchasers would encounter the mark and perceive it as a source indicator. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 3:10 am
The drawing of the mark was found to not be a substantially exact representation of the mark as depicted in the original specimen, and both specimens failed to show the applied-for mark in use for the identified goods. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 6:40 am
" Therefore the Board rejected its claim.Opposer relied on its use of its mark CRAFT BEARING COMPANY since 1994, but applicant maintained that the mark is generic or merely descriptive. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 2:52 am by John L. Welch
The Board noted that Applicant's standard character mark might be used in any font, size, style or color, but "even if applicant’s mark were displayed in a style of lettering highly similar to that of registrant’s mark, the two marks would still not be visually similar." [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 2:56 am
In re Mauna Kea Rum Company, LLC, Serial No. 87475384 (June 27, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Jonathan Hudis).The Marks: The Board found the term MAUNA KEA to be the dominant element of the applied-for mark and the cited mark. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 2:40 am
"Employment of a mark to promote a service not yet rendered is not use of a mark in commerce under the statute. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 5:53 am
Wellington).The Marks: The word HONEYCOMB dominates both marks, but "honeycomb" may have a different connotation in each. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 4:13 am
" With regard the Board's consideration of the prosecution history of the TREK mark, wherein Trek argued that its mark was not confusable with five other marks containing the word TREK, the Board found that the RANGER TREK mark could co-exist with TREK as well. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 4:37 am
It has used TINKER BELL as a trademark for dolls since 2007 and registered the mark in 2009 without a Section 2(f) acquired distinctiveness claim.Appellant United challenged the Board's findings on the strength of Disney's mark and the similarity of the involved marks. [read post]
19 Sep 2024, 3:53 am
" As to the marks, although the first word of a mark may be dominant, "here the word KID is a short, mono-syllabic word that does little to visually distinguish the marks. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 3:19 am by R. David Donoghue
  The agreement released all false marking claims related to the two patents at issue, but did not attempt to waive any possible false marking by defendant as of the date of the agreement. [read post]
18 May 2012, 7:36 pm by Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Mark Lynas has has just published an article in the Guardian about energy policy in Asia. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 10:03 am
Applicant maintained that the marks differ in appearance, sound, and meaning. [read post]