Search for: "Plaintiff(s)" Results 6941 - 6960 of 178,474
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2017, 10:00 pm by Doug Austin
Rowland granted in part and denied in part the plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel the defendant to include certain custodians in their email search, ordering the defendant to search emails of five additional custodians (including the Mayor of Chicago), but not requiring the defendant to search emails for an additional three custodians requested by the plaintiff. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 4:55 am by Gregory Dell
In reviewing plaintiffs file, GENEX found no evidence supporting her claim that she was totally disabled and entitled to receive long term disability benefits, which prompted GENEX to terminate plaintiffs benefits. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 7:45 am by The Docket Navigator
The court denied defendant's motion to transfer venue of plaintiffs patent infringement claims on the basis of a forum selection clause in defendant's Terms of Service. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 12:33 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
That comparative negligence finding reduced the plaintiff's damages from $175,000 to $105,000. [read post]
19 May 2011, 1:30 pm
The plaintiffs brought a class action against Snapple Beverage Corporation, alleging that the defendant’s  labeling of its teas and juice drinks as ‘All Natural’ was misleading to consumers because the beverages were sweetened with high fructose corn syrup (“HFCS”). [read post]
11 Mar 2018, 12:57 pm by J. Ross Pepper
  The plaintiffs principal place of business was in Missouri, its loans were payable in that state, and it had no offices or employees located in Tennessee. [read post]
11 Mar 2018, 12:57 pm by J. Ross Pepper
  The plaintiffs principal place of business was in Missouri, its loans were payable in that state, and it had no offices or employees located in Tennessee. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 5:00 am
Apparently, he not only failed to present any expert testimony, but he neglected to present a paid receipt or other proof that “defendant negligently overfilled the transmission of plaintiff's van which led to the transmission's failure. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 1:42 am
Plaintiff's motion for sanctions against a defendant who violated a court order by raising the issue of plaintiff's motivation for incorporation in the Cayman Islands was granted in part. [read post]
4 Jul 2015, 1:51 pm by Edward Smith
The injured party (Plaintiffs) deposition is a most critical part of every personal injury case. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 10:47 pm
The plaintiffs lawyers are claiming that they have to sift through as many as 50 million documents that they got from Bayer. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
These, said the court, provide ample evidence to support the conclusion that Plaintiff's performance was unsatisfactory, and thereby establish, for purposes of reviewing Plaintiff's Article 78 action, that Plaintiff's termination was done in good faith. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 4:47 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
.), the court affirmed in part and vacated in part a trial court’s decisions in a bad faith and Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law (UTPCPL) claims against a contractor.According to the Opinion, the case arose out of a Plaintiffs lawsuit against a carrier and a contractor over repairs to the Plaintiffs house. [read post]
9 May 2019, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Rather, the plaintiffs alleged injury from the device was discovered in New York by the plaintiffs New York doctors. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 5:00 am
The Plaintiff claimed that the weight of the evidence overwhelmingly established that the Defendant’s negligence caused the Plaintiffs injuries. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 5:00 am
As such, the Plaintiffs claim of a heightened duty of care owed to the Plaintiff was rejected. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
The flaw in plaintiffs reliance on O Centro here, is that plaintiff has still not obtained that CSA exception—and whether plaintiffs showing made to the DEA is sufficient to qualify for this exemption remains an open question that is not before this Court. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 6:55 am by Resnick Law Group, P.C.
The defendant, according to the court’s ruling, terminated the plaintiff after twenty-six years of employment, when she was eighty-two years old. [read post]