Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 6941 - 6960
of 9,091
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2021, 5:37 am
Generally Public naming of litigants is one aspect of the broader "presumption, long supported by courts, that the public has a common-law right of access to judicial records. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 6:43 am
Grimaldi grounds, the district court’s grant of summary judgment to MTV on the resulting trademark claims. [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 8:10 am
In Matter of Karen P. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 5:00 am
Janus Capital (Del; the voting results on the advisory vote are here), the complaint was filed in the federal district court of Colorado (Pinsly v Scheid, 1:2011cv01732 (D. [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 1:00 am
The Court noted several reasons why a different constitutional analysis was required at Guantanamo than in Johnson v. [read post]
24 Aug 2024, 8:41 am
” This principle, derived from the case Colorado River Water Conservation District v. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
While these ordinances often contain a “criminal component”, municipalities rarely enforce the criminal penalties, but deem them necessary to cause compliance.Notwithstanding the laudable intentions behind this type of point of sale ordinance, and the usual reluctance of municipalities to enforce the criminal penalties associated therewith, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio in Thompson V. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
While these ordinances often contain a “criminal component”, municipalities rarely enforce the criminal penalties, but deem them necessary to cause compliance.Notwithstanding the laudable intentions behind this type of point of sale ordinance, and the usual reluctance of municipalities to enforce the criminal penalties associated therewith, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio in Thompson V. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 12:12 pm
District Court in the Northern District of Illinois ruled that this did not contravene congressional intent because Congress had never amended IEEPA to prevent this use. [read post]
9 May 2022, 8:51 am
District Court for Washington, D.C. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 11:57 am
In United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 10:43 am
The first is that the district court explicitly instructed the jury — at BNSF’s request — that Loos’ award would not be subject to income tax. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 10:04 am
People First of Alabama v. [read post]
12 Aug 2017, 4:00 am
The Judicial District Court for the Parish of Livingston dismissed the matter as abandoned. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 9:07 am
Case citation: Welch v. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 7:08 am
Pix Credit hereWhile interest in this case, HKSAR v Lai Man Ling [2022] 4 HKC 410, [2022] HKDC 355, reported in September 2022, may be diminishing, its relevance requires sustained examination. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 9:00 pm
Twenty-three states and the District of Columbia permit minors to consent to contraceptive services on their own behalf, and another twenty-four states permit them to consent in at least some circumstances. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 12:57 pm
Supreme Court in Washington v. [read post]
31 May 2007, 12:49 pm
Supreme Court's intervening decision in McLaughlin v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 10:55 am
O.L.'s reliance on United States v. [read post]
