Search for: "Strong v. Strong"
Results 6941 - 6960
of 19,644
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2007, 11:29 am
The John Doe v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 10:06 pm
The effect here would be to create a strong presumption against exclusion. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 5:00 am
Licensing, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 1:24 pm
See Pelman v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 8:51 am
See Thorogood v. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 10:00 pm
Rule 23(c)(4) has been been placed under a microscope in the past few years, largely because of the judicial response to the Supreme Court’s Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 4:25 am
Actively participating in the arbitration process without objection precludes the party later claiming that the matter presented to the arbitrator was not subject to arbitration Matter of Jandrew v County of Cortland, 2011 NY Slip Op 04143, Appellate Division, Third Department Cortland County terminated Bryon Jandrew from his position with the County.Jandrew filed a grievance under the relevant collective bargaining agreement [CBA]. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 2:29 pm
James Grimmelmann’s twitter feed for a strong reaction and trenchant critique.) [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 5:47 am
The Appeal The main ground of appeal was based on the common law right of access to court, established in Raymond v Honey [1983 1 AC.1, 13] and a series of pre Human Rights cases such as R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex parte Leech [1994] QB 198, and R (Anufrijeva) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] 1 AC 604 at 621[26]. [read post]
16 May 2008, 3:29 pm
" United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2007, 7:06 pm
Mann v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 3:30 am
Brown v. [read post]
31 Mar 2024, 7:40 pm
But, for reasons summarized in my last post, the merits case against the plan is strong, bolstered by Biden v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 7:31 am
Case citation: C.M.D. v. [read post]
17 May 2020, 2:35 pm
Steel Corp. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 5:48 pm
On this policy issue, I don't have a strong view. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 1:50 pm
That’s because, in most instances courts have decided that hospitals predominantly provide services, and thus do not qualify as “sellers” subject to strict product liability.That brings us to the heart of the matter – what are that “strong majority of jurisdictions”? [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 5:07 am
The process of questioning potential jurors in a death penalty case, and weeding out those who hold such strong feelings for or against capital punishment that they would be unable to apply the law, is known as "death-qualifying" a jury. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 11:19 am
First, Strickland v. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 1:49 am
The much-anticipated decision in NT 1 & NT 2 v Google LLC [2018] EWHC 799 (QB) was handed down on 13 April 2018. [read post]
