Search for: "AT&T Services Inc. " Results 6961 - 6980 of 17,733
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2016, 6:06 pm by Justin A
Supreme Court decided Husky International Electronics, Inc. v. [read post]
22 May 2016, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Gallagher said “I don’t accept that we made an error at all. [read post]
19 May 2016, 7:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
We can’t tell if it’s functional or simply to make it difficult to make aftermarket parts. 1201 is used to keep our industry from reverse engineering and even servicing cars. [read post]
19 May 2016, 7:34 am by Eric Goldman
” Case citation: International Information Systems Security Certification Consortium, Inc. v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 1:13 pm by Louthian Law Firm
A sleep therapy products supplier, Respironics Inc., based in Pennsylvania, agreed to resolve charges of False Claims Act violations by paying $34.8 million because of a qui tam suit brought by a whistleblower. [read post]
18 May 2016, 1:13 pm by Louthian Law Firm
A sleep therapy products supplier, Respironics Inc., based in Pennsylvania, agreed to resolve charges of False Claims Act violations by paying $34.8 million because of a qui tam suit brought by a whistleblower. [read post]
18 May 2016, 1:13 pm by Louthian Law Firm
A sleep therapy products supplier, Respironics Inc., based in Pennsylvania, agreed to resolve charges of False Claims Act violations by paying $34.8 million because of a qui tam suit brought by a whistleblower. [read post]
17 May 2016, 10:42 am by John Chierichella
  A succinct articulation of the rule can be found in Consortium HSG Technischer Service GmbH and GeBe Gebäude-und Betriebstechnik GmbH Südwest Co., Management KG, B-292699.6, June 24, 2004, 2004 CPD ¶ 134 (upholding award to a joint venture even though the ownership of one member of the joint venture changed): [T]he record shows only that the corporate shares of SGM changed hands. [read post]
17 May 2016, 7:32 am by Ron Coleman
This seems to raise some interesting questions, doesn’t it? [read post]
16 May 2016, 2:33 pm by Erin Morrow Hawley
In this case, the Little Sisters of the Poor don’t qualify for the exemption because their ministry (caring for the dying) serves those who do not share their faith. [read post]
16 May 2016, 1:49 am by Steve Mehta
The dispute arose concerning property preservation services that Lucas Contracting alleged the defendants had purchased from it. [read post]
14 May 2016, 3:34 am by Florian Mueller
But I have no working relationship with Oracle at this stage (and don't plan on having any again), and I'm free to publish things that are in the public record. [read post]