Search for: "Arizona Supreme Court" Results 6961 - 6980 of 9,063
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2011, 11:39 am by brian
In October, a majority of the Supreme Court wrongly insisted there was no evidence that the shortage had any bearing on whether an execution can be done constitutionally. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 11:03 am by Bill Raftery
Arizona SB 1185 Would change the state’s existing laws that allow the Supreme Court and Superior Courts (pursuant to rules adopted by the Supreme Court) to have e-filing to require they do (“may” to “shall”) Moreover, the bill would require the electronic access to court records and add bulk data to required material the courts shall provide. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 9:06 am by CJLF Staff
  Province had escaped last summer from the Arizona State Prison where he was serving a life sentence for murder and robbery, and was later captured in Wyoming. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 8:49 am by mjpetro
In Opperman, the Supreme Court noted that local police departments routinely inventory and secure the contents of impounded automobiles. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 7:48 am by Steve Hall
In October, a majority of the Supreme Court wrongly insisted there was no evidence that the shortage had any bearing on whether an execution can be done constitutionally. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 7:24 pm by lawmrh
In response to yesterday’s follow-up post on the Arizona Supreme Court’s 6-month suspension of Jeffrey Phillips, Phoenix’s prolific T.V. commercial personal injury advertiser, comes news from a well-placed source in response. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 12:37 pm by John Elwood
Booker[(2005)]—that all facts that fix mandatorily a defendant’s sentence should be found by a jury or admitted by the defendant—and the Supreme Court’s decision in Almendarez-Torres,” but of course she was “bound by the Supreme Court’s ruling[]” in that case. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 12:00 pm by Bill Raftery
” Washington State introduces six bills to remove or increase the mandatory judicial retirement age Arizona bill would require supreme court and superior courts provide bulk electronic case data to companies E-filing/E-filing fees: Bills introduced in Arizona, Oregon, South Dakota, Virginia, and Wyoming Bills in Montana and New Hampshire would require judges instruct juries as to jury nullification Proposals to end or… [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 5:02 am by zshapiro
Wingo the Supreme Court set four factors that must be considered in determining whether there is a violation of the Sixth Amendment’s speedy trial provision. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 9:06 pm by lawmrh
And the Arizona Supreme Court Order stated that, “During the suspension, however, Phillips’s name may not be used in firm advertisements, letterhead, or other communications. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 5:38 pm by Troy McKenzie
The creditor's statutory argument before the Supreme Court is a pretty straightforward syllogism: A compulsory counterclaim to a noncore claim is also noncore. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 4:21 pm by William W. Bowser
At least one state supreme court has ruled that employers don't need to make such accommodations. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 9:02 am by Steve Hall
Hammond’s lawyers wrote in their appeal to the State Supreme Court. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 8:13 am by Steve Hall
"I find it disconcerting that you have prominent people like Ohio Supreme Court Justice (Paul) Pfeifer and former prisons director Terry Collins who have called repeatedly for a review of the death penalty. ... [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 9:30 am by azatty
Not to disappoint you, but you should know the truth: You probably could have gotten to listen to an Arizona Supreme Court justice, or the State Bar Presi [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 8:27 pm by cdw
The court also rejected the Ninth Circuit’s application of Arizona v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 2:09 pm by Aaron
Courtesy of Law Offices of Dena Alo-Colbeck “Writing and Research for Washington Attorneys” The following criminal cases of note were decided this week: Washington State Law Washington State Supreme Court: State v. [read post]