Search for: "DOES 1-8" Results 6961 - 6980 of 32,311
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2024, 1:12 pm by HRWatchdog
[Two Half-Day Virtual Seminars] Leaves of Absence (Part 1) Thursday, August 8, 2024, from 9 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 2:20 pm by Lyle Denniston
The document was an attempt to keep intact a fairly modest victory the couples had won last month in a 2-1 panel ruling. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 9:40 pm
Perhaps surprising to some, Brown's brief essentially agreed with Starr in responding to two out of the three questions posed by the Court: whether Prop 8 was a revision or an amendment and whether Prop 8 violated separation of powers. [read post]
6 May 2016, 8:11 am by Ruby Powers
The rule does not apply to individuals with a 17-month STEM OPT expiring prior to Oct. 8. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 9:00 am by Doug Cornelius
Here is the rest of the agenda: Day One: Wednesday, May 3, 2011 8:50 – 9:00 PEI welcome & Chairman’s introduction 9:00 – 10:00 Expert panel:  Brave new world – Impact of SEC registration on finance and operations - Creating a culture of compliance - Getting buy-in from the GPs and other key stakeholders - What does it mean to take on the role of a Chief Compliance Officer? [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 4:19 am
Strongly positive: 21 Slightly positive: 13 Neutral: 16 Slightly Negative: 8 Strongly Negative: 1 So what do I make of these results? [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 1:05 am by Francois Pochart
Bramford, docket No. 17/08818, page 8 [3] Court of appeal of Paris, Pole 5, Chamber 1, 27 March 2018, Manitou vs. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 3:25 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Prior to moving to New York, petitioner sent a letter dated 1 February 2006, to the New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services (DCJS) informing it that he was required to register as a sex offender in Florida and the he intended to move to New York by 8 February 2006. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 11:23 am
Some of his work on the subject may be found here.[1] Grant Peck, Thais May Charge Reputed Arms Dealer, Associated Press, March 7, 2008 (available at news.yahoo.com).[2] Id.[3] Id.[4] Id.[5] Id.[6] Id.[7] Id.[8] Id.[9] Id.[10] Extradition Treaty, Dec. 14, 1983, art. 2, para. 1, S. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
This constitutes another procedural violation.Further proceedings[8] The Board does not see any need for going beyond the remittal pursuant to A 111(1) by commenting the further steps to be taken by the first instance and by fixing conditions (Vorgaben) for the future composition of the OD: as far as can be seen from the file, the composition of the OD that had taken the oral decision had not violated A 19(2). [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 6:20 pm
Integra, September 25, 2005, available athttp://madisonian.net/archives/2005/06/14/merck-v-integra/ (last visited Nov. 8, 2005) ("Although a strict constructionist, Justice Scalia did not analyze the word "solely" in 271(e)(1). [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 4:36 am by Broc Romanek
Companies will need to decide whether to narrow the language to just "executive" officers (ISS uses the term "executives") and whether to define "significant" (ISS does not). [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 2:16 pm by PaulKostro
However, the statute is to be construed in light of the common law and does not abrogate it. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 2:28 pm
(5) If repeated and systematic re-utilisation is a requirement, (a) what does “systematic” mean? [read post]