Search for: "Defendants A-F"
Results 6961 - 6980
of 29,830
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2011, 9:41 am
Jarrett, 447 F.3d at 525. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 4:08 am
McGainey, 37 F.3d 682, 684 (D.C. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 8:29 am
Fischer, 974 F. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 6:52 am
F. 7 (1996). [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 12:00 pm
Douglas F. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 6:52 am
Groth, 682 F.2d 578, 580 (6th Cir. 1982) (“[W]aiver of a jury trial does not bar a demand for a jury on retrial of the same case unless the original waiver explicitly covers this contingency. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 8:42 pm
Muskingum Watershed Conservancy District, --F.3d--, 2016 WL 6832974 (6th Cir. 2016).According to Harper, prior to the 2009 amendment of the False Claims Act (“FCA”) by the Fraud Enforcement Recovery Act, the FCA’s reverse-false claim provision essentially imposed liability “only [on] those defendants who knowingly perpetrated a fraud against the government. [read post]
1 May 2019, 2:38 pm
Co.. 776 F.3d 603 (9th Cir. 2014) (applying California law). [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 12:49 pm
Tom [F]air. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 8:42 pm
Muskingum Watershed Conservancy District, --F.3d--, 2016 WL 6832974 (6th Cir. 2016).According to Harper, prior to the 2009 amendment of the False Claims Act (“FCA”) by the Fraud Enforcement Recovery Act, the FCA’s reverse-false claim provision essentially imposed liability “only [on] those defendants who knowingly perpetrated a fraud against the government. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 12:12 pm
By George F. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 6:49 am
., --- F.3d ----, 2012 WL 3765010 (6th Cir.) [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 12:47 pm
Trudeau, --- F.3d ----, 2011 WL 5927435 (7th Cir.)Some background. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 11:53 am
Maytag Corp., 450 F.3d 1322 (11th Cir. 2006), in which Maytag supplied the court with a declaration written by one of its analysts that stated that the amount in controversy exceeded $5 million. [read post]
21 Apr 2007, 4:42 am
Toeppen, 141 F.3d 1316, 1324 (9th Cir. 1998). [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 6:46 am
Ramirez-Chilel, 289 F.3d at 751 n.8. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 9:12 pm
Defendant actually did not consent. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 6:45 am
At issue in the case is whether a defendant has a right to allocution at a community control violation hearing. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 5:01 am
ETS Payphones, Inc., 408 F.3d 727, 735 (11th Cir. 2005) (stating that the SEC’s burden for showing the amount subject to disgorgement is “light”). [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 7:00 am
MERRILL LYNCH, 785 F. [read post]
