Search for: "Does 1 - 30" Results 6961 - 6980 of 28,651
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2020, 10:02 am by Jon Brodkin
Enlarge / A T-Mobile logo at a store in New York on April 30, 2018. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 8:37 am by Woodruff Family Law Group
Plaintiffs sent a public records request to Defendant, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill (UNC-CH), dated September 30, 2016. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 6:12 am by Dan Harris
The typical arrangement is 30–35% of any recovery aft [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 3:20 am by Lindsey Meuser Rowland
There is no reason why one person develops PTSD and another does not. [read post]
In addition, and contrary to some concerns that have been raised, the Proclamation does not impact F-1 and H-4 employment authorization provided under an EAD (work authorization card). [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 9:55 am by Ellen Savage, J.D.
This is true even if the individuals have used some or all of their six weeks of benefits by June 30, and then take additional weeks of baby bonding time off after July 1, because it is the initial claim start date that determines whether there are six or eight weeks of benefits available. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 8:42 am by Renae Lloyd
  Whistleblower awards can range from 10 percent to 30 percent of the money collected when the monetary sanctions exceed $1 million. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 6:34 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Both Scott and the Krinsky defendants interfered in his relationship with the newly hired attorney and as a result of their interference, attorney Michael Gentile withdrew from representing him (Savitt 7/31/19 affidavit at ¶¶ 49-54 and 9/30/19 affidavit at ¶ 40 [Doc No. 20]). [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 6:30 am by Jacquelyn Greene
The district attorney then has 30 days to file any objection to the petition. [read post]
  The proclamation does not affect petitions or applications filed in the United States, even if they are filed to change to H-1B, H-2B, H-4, L-1, L-2, J-1 or J-2 status. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 5:50 am by Kevin Kaufman
Take the case of a biomedical engineer, Mark, who earns $325,000 (taxable income) annually and is married to Casey, who does not work outside the home. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 5:37 pm by Krzysztof Pacula
In his Opinion, Advocate General emphasizes that the formulation of paragraph 30 of the judgment in R must have been influenced by the factual context of that case. [read post]