Search for: "Does 1-30"
Results 6961 - 6980
of 27,623
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2017, 4:49 pm
Congress then reduced the depreciation amount to 40 percent in 2018 and 30 percent in 2019. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 4:49 pm
Congress then reduced the depreciation amount to 40 percent in 2018 and 30 percent in 2019. [read post]
9 Sep 2024, 6:36 am
Cases 483 (writ den. (2024), § 21.06[1][a] n. 16.1]. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 12:00 pm
Does the company train relevant staff on how to handle whistleblowing reports? [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
Under the state’s Effective Date of Laws Act (the statute seeking to comply with the constitution’s requirement), “[a] bill passed prior to June 1 of a calendar year that does not provide for an effective date in the terms of the bill shall become effective on January 1 of the following year, or upon its becoming a law, whichever is later. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 4:59 am
HB 1219 Effective: July 1, 2013 Code Citations Affected: IC 34-30; 36-1 Public Law Number: 106-2013 Privacy of home addresses. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 2:24 pm
The deadline for submission is Sept. 30, 2019. [read post]
8 May 2020, 10:25 am
What If a Claim of a COVID-19 Related Illness Is Not Rejected Within 30 Days? [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 3:01 pm
It would normally be necessary to prove that the ambiguity deprives the skilled person of the promise of the invention by not enabling him to obtain the desired effects.In the present case, however, the ambiguity exists only at the very edge of the scope of claim 1 (the upper limit of the carbohydrate amount), and does not permeate the whole claim. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 10:42 am
The data in the below tables and in the detailed chart does not include companies conducting Say-On-Pay votes that are mandated by virtue of the company's participation in the Troubled Asset Relief Program and also does not include companies that voluntarily held Say-On-Pay votes (e.g., companies which held their annual shareholder meeting shortly before the January 21, 2011 effective date for Say-On-Pay but which nevertheless opted to voluntarily hold a Say-On-Pay… [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 5:01 pm
Now it is true that the present decision does not explicitly invoke A 69, but does this really make a difference? [read post]
3 Nov 2006, 11:34 am
There does not appear to be any mechanism to permit the Respondents to contest the claimed noncompliance. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 5:01 pm
Thus, the original set of claims does not satisfy the requirements of A 82. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 5:16 am
The UK having now cut its direct ties with EU law, what does its future hold for the intermediary liability protections in Articles 12 to 15 of the Electronic Commerce Directive? [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 3:50 am
Our office is open until 8:30 p.m. on Wednesdays and Saturday from 9 a.m. to 1 p.m. for working folks. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 4:30 am
(Editors’ Note: See CAFA Law Blog analysis of Lowdermilk posted on July 30, 2007.) [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 7:16 am
Or does wearing ‘Google Glass’ in the car violate existing driving laws in Michigan and other states? [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 12:13 pm
A court case does not necessarily end with the jury announcing its verdict and a judge imposing a sentence. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 9:32 am
By August 1, Elliott had made up his mind that Olson had to go. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 10:03 am
Beginning on January 1, 2016, a “commercial fundraiser” in California is defined as any individual, corporation, unincorporated association, or other legal entity who for compensation does any of the following: Solicits funds, assets, or property in this state for charitable purposes. [read post]
