Search for: "Downs v State"
Results 6961 - 6980
of 40,854
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2020, 7:00 am
(Complaint, Lematta v. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 6:56 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 6:23 am
The US Supreme Court heard oral arguments Tuesday in California v. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 6:03 am
(Chambers. v. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] No Sealing of Case Based on "Defendant['s] … Damaging Assertions Against Plaintiffs"
11 Nov 2020, 5:01 am
Bluth (N.Y. trial ct.) in Choi v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 4:55 pm
For more on this, see U.S. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 2:54 pm
Although there may be five votes to strike down the ACA’s individual mandate – the provision in the law that directs virtually all Americans to buy health insurance – a majority of the court in California v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 1:06 pm
They are raising speculative questions about the electoral processes of entire states, even where the states in question have handed them notable wins down ballot. [1] Walter N. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 12:00 pm
For example, back in June, the Supreme Court ruled in Bostock v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 10:58 am
In its controversial 2012 ruling in NFIB v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 8:58 am
Longarzo * DMCA’s Unhelpful 512(f) Preempts Helpful State Law Claims–Stevens v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 7:12 am
Then asks Verrilli to address whether states would actually have lower paperwork costs if mandate were struck down. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 6:35 am
The Republican states argue further that the mandate cannot be severed from the rest of the law and that, as a result, the entirety of the law must be struck down. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 6:03 am
“Supreme Court hears latest GOP bid to strike down Obamacare”: David G. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 5:06 am
They are raising speculative questions about the electoral processes of entire states, even where the states in question have handed them notable wins down ballot. [1] Walter N. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 4:03 am
Supreme Court is being asked once again in California v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm
The Affordable Care Act (ACA) makes its third trip to the Supreme Court today under the caption California v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 6:16 pm
Texas comes down to standing—and state standing in particular—this could present the Chief with an opportunity to put the doctrine of "special solicitude" to bed. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 11:09 am
Field v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 10:30 am
Sanford decision and has long been dropped down the memory hole. [read post]
