Search for: "Files v. State"
Results 6961 - 6980
of 91,637
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2012, 4:51 pm
(Eugene Volokh) I briefly blogged about this question in 2009; now there’s a lawsuit, White v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 10:19 am
See Washington v. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 1:15 am
Last week, the European Court of Human Rights decided in the case of Haas v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 2:44 am
In Thornton v. [read post]
26 Sep 2020, 12:59 pm
See below for the details of significant filings this week. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 4:02 am
Moore v. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 1:07 pm
In Arista Records v. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 7:55 am
Jewel v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 12:49 pm
In Allegheny Reproductive Health Center v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 12:02 am
Louie, No. 11-336 (cert. petition filed Sep. 15, 2011), the case asking the U.S. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:04 am
Hunter is pursuing the arguments from Bruen v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:56 pm
In State Farm v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 9:32 am
Not only are extraterritorial laws inherently undemocratic (regulating foreigners, with no say in domestic political processes), but they also can retard and interfere with the creation of meaningful harmonized international, state-to-state agreements. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 1:12 pm
Trask v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 12:55 pm
As of September 30, 2013, approximately 495 cases alleging Femur Fractures have been filed in California state court. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 9:59 pm
§ 101 By Joseph Herndon -- In the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiff filed a declaratory judgment action on seeking a declaration that none of Plaintiff's accused products infringed any valid claims of Defendant's U.S. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 1:41 pm
You've been living in the United States, and the DHS has treated you pretty shabbily (IMHO). [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 4:23 pm
Looking to get your first argument in the United States Supreme Court? [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 2:59 pm
Niantic filed the present motion to dismiss the case for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6), on the basis that the asserted patent claims are invalid under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 11:30 am
Here's a case where a Ninth Circuit panel whose prior opinion was summarily reversed by the Supreme Court says it'd be just fine were the Court to do so again.I was actually thinking last week about what a generally frivolous waste it is for litigants to file rehearing petitions in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
