Search for: "Plaintiff(s)" Results 6961 - 6980 of 178,474
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2019, 5:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
"With respect to Plaintiff's allegation that the hiring committee gave him negative evaluations for his teaching demonstration in order to cover up its discriminatory animus, the Circuit Court said that such "negative evaluations that SUNY gave [Plaintiff] ... conveyed legitimate concerns that [Plaintiff's] teaching philosophy conflicted with the university’s curriculum and needs and equally legitimate concerns about… [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 5:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
"With respect to Plaintiff's allegation that the hiring committee gave him negative evaluations for his teaching demonstration in order to cover up its discriminatory animus, the Circuit Court said that such "negative evaluations that SUNY gave [Plaintiff] ... conveyed legitimate concerns that [Plaintiff's] teaching philosophy conflicted with the university’s curriculum and needs and equally legitimate concerns about… [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 10:19 pm by Patricia Salkin
Plaintiffs Amended Complaint also plausibly alleged that the Board both applied different and more vigorous use variance standards to Plaintiff in evaluating Plaintiffs use variance application and displayed animus towards Muslims generally; these allegations were sufficient to state a claim under RLUIPA’s nondiscrimination provision. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 7:01 pm by DeFrancisco & Falgiatano
There are limitations to the plaintiffs right to designate where a case should be heard, however, and if a court lacks jurisdiction over a matter, the plaintiff cannot demand that it preside over a case. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 6:44 pm by Madelaine Lane
  Overall, the Court ruled that factual questions existed with respect to plaintiffs wage-loss claim, and therefore the trial court’s grant of summary disposition on that claim was improper. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 11:01 am by Arfaa Law Group
The Plaintiffs Alleged Harm Reportedly, the plaintiffs child was born at the defendant medical center in 1978. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 1:56 pm by Law Offices of Robert Dixon
Dillard’s, Inc., the plaintiff was involved in an automobile accident with a Dillard’s delivery van. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 2:23 pm
The notion - that defense lawyers allow systems to exist where they just have to trust, without safeguard, the plaintiffs' lawyers and the doctors they hire to evaluate cases - lacks any foundation, notwithstanding Professor Brickman's 177 page polemic. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 2:23 pm
The notion - that defense lawyers allow systems to exist where they just have to trust, without safeguard, the plaintiffs' lawyers and the doctors they hire to evaluate cases - lacks any foundation, notwithstanding Professor Brickman's 177 page polemic. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 7:00 am by Josh Blackman
Judge Oteken's order is two paragraphs: Plaintiff invokes this Court's diversity jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 6:09 am by Docket Navigator
The court denied defendant's motion to compel the production of documents regarding the IRS's determination that plaintiff's licensing agreements with its Puerto Rican subsidiary were not arms-length transactions because the documents were not relevant to the remanded damages trial. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 7:11 am by Docket Navigator
The court granted defendant's motion to exclude the testimony of plaintiff's damages expert regarding transition damages as unreliable. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 7:42 am by Docket Navigator
The court denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment that its call center patent was not unenforceable for inequitable conduct and rejected plaintiff's argument regarding a lack of materiality. [read post]
12 May 2021, 11:15 am by Kevin
Australian dollars, for example, are (as I am writing this) said to be worth about 78 U.S. cents each, so if the plaintiffs demand in this case had been $32 trillion Australian, that would translate to a much more reasonable US$25 trillion or so. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 7:39 am by Media Law Prof
A piece from the New York Times on the British government's push to change current libel laws and the country's image as a haven for defamation plaintiffs. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 5:11 am
Howard Bashman's How Appealing blog has a link to an article that reports on an interesting appellate argument in a California case where the plaintiff's attorney received the notes of a defense lawyer (exactly how is in dispute but the... [read post]