Search for: "ROBERTS v. STATE" Results 6961 - 6980 of 16,822
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2010, 9:39 am by Kent Scheidegger
The appellant, Robert Shuman, claims his trial lawyer failed to raise the defense that he killed two business associates because his ingestion of Zoloft caused a drug-induced state of agitation called akathisia. [read post]
8 Nov 2006, 5:36 am
Olson Guideline "Departures" at Sentencing by Robert Don Gifford Off The Beaten Path: A Case Study of Unusual Post-Booker Litigation In United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 5:15 pm by Ronald Mann
His suit challenging the secretary’s decision has already been up to the Supreme Court once – leading to a remarkable 2012 ruling in Salazar v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 1:58 am
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court issued a ruling allowing for the admissibility of evidence, even if said evidence was improperly seized. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 1:55 am
  Emma recounts the state of confusion of copyright in Trinidad’s Carnival industry also via a lovely song of this year’s popular Carnival tunes, which she amended for the Kat-readership's pleasure. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 10:06 am by Neil Rosenbaum
The cost of the long, hard discovery slog that usually precedes class certification is reason enough for defendants in putative class actions -- particularly those in the Sixth Circuit states of Michigan, Ohio, Kentucky, and Tennessee -- to take a close look at whether there is a better way. - Robert J. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 11:12 am by Fred Wertheimer
Wisconsin Right to Life, the Roberts Court took the opposite path, striking down campaign finance laws in major cases, including Citizens United v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 7:05 am by Nabiha Syed
Bennett, consolidated with McComish v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts tried (obviously unsuccessfully) to avoid the complete overturning of Roe v. [read post]
3 Jul 2010, 1:21 am by INFORRM
  In Purcell v Ireland, the Commission (in an admissibility decision) upheld a reporting ban on Sinn Fein stating “The restrictions are designed to deny representatives of known terrorist organisations and their political supporters the possibility of using the broadcast media as a platform for advocating their cause, encouraging support for their organisations and conveying the impression of their legitimacy. [read post]