Search for: "Strong v. State" Results 6961 - 6980 of 16,399
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2016, 2:44 pm by Michael Grossman
” Delivering the majority decision in Voisine v United States, Justice Elena Kagan eloquently stated: “Reckless con­duct, which requires the conscious disregard of a known risk, is not an accident: It involves a deliberate decision to endanger another. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 2:02 pm by Sandy Levinson
Lee" or by the Supreme Court's decision in Texas v White. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 7:36 am by Joy Waltemath
Like the district court, the appeals court identified strong evidence in the record that the machinist’s discipline for failing to follow instructions and running scrap had nothing to do with his race. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 5:53 am by Jonathan Abel
To me, the bigger challenge is that it’s not politically feasible to make the records public in states with strong police unions. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
New York State’s Human Rights Law does not protect an employee from all retaliation, only from retaliation that results in an injury or harmNapierala v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 2016 NY Slip Op 04832, Appellate Division, Fourth DepartmentLisa Napierala challenged New York State Division of Human Rights’ [SDHR] determination of "no probable cause" with respect to her complaint that Erie Community College [ECC] had retaliated against… [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 10:45 am
’s special rapporteur in 2011 following strong advocacy by the United States to create the mandate. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
The State courts and legislatures The first is the decision of the United States Supreme Court in North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 10:23 am by Benjamin Wittes, Zoe Bedell
But we have also contended, with respect to the main defendant so far, Twitter, that “Twitter's defenses are probably strong, there being no particular reason in the complaint[s] themselves to connect the specific attack[s] with anything that happened on Twitter. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 10:23 am by Chanel Sterie
The question raises serious debates not only in the United States, but also in Europe and, closer to home, in Quebec. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 7:50 am
Public outcry and support for those harmed by excessive force incidents may not be as strong, but at least the video would still exist -- and it would be obtainable through discovery in a future lawsuit. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 7:40 am by Joy Waltemath
” The dissent, however, believed that no reasonable jury could find that the agency’s assertion that it didn’t hire her due to her inexperience was pretexual (Walsh v. [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
Executive Power After United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 8:00 pm by Hannah Roskey
However, a strong dissent by one panel member argued that the majority had misapplied the guidance from the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in Communications, Energy and Paperworkers Union of Canada, Local 30 v. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 7:23 am by Ronald Collins
Question: Based on your extensive research, do you think that Bob Woodward and Scott Armstrong’s major take-away points (beyond United States v. [read post]