Search for: "United States v. Close" Results 6961 - 6980 of 14,200
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2017, 7:39 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Closing time: Removing the State of Oklahoma from alcohol regulation in Indian Country. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 1:02 am
However, the judge did not err in applying Article 7(1)(e); what he had actually done was to state that the policy underlying that article was relevant to the assessment of whether there was a sufficient similarity for the purposes of Article 9(1)(c), both the mark and the sign being shapes. * An assessment of similarity had to be carried out on a global basis by reference to the degree of similarity between the mark and the sign (here the Court cited Case C-252/07 Intel Corp Inc v… [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:50 am by Victoria VanBuren
Supreme Court decided several cases related to arbitration: On April 27, 2011, in a 5-4 decision, the United States Supreme Court ruled that the the Federal Arbitration Act preempted California law with regard to class arbitration in AT&T Mobility, LLC v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 9:03 am by John Elwood
First, a closely watched labor class action case: Wal-Mart v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 1:30 pm by Maureen Johnston
United States 14-29Issue: (1) Whether, in a prosecution for insider trading under § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 10:16 am by Staley Smith
Writing for the majority in Maslenjak v. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
”[1] The constitutional sphere in the United States, the UK, Canada, and Germany are honorable members of that commonly explored (to put it mildly) “platinum club. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 5:45 am by Josh Blackman
The court divided, sharply, about whether a consumer could sue a foreign manufacturer in state court over a product sold in the United States. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 10:52 am
  In America, for example, several claims have been brought under the Alien Tort Claims Act (ATCA), which gives federal courts power to hear civil cases brought by foreign citizens for injuries caused by actions “in violation of the law of nations or a treaty of the United States. [read post]