Search for: "Branch v. Mays"
Results 681 - 700
of 6,279
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2023, 5:30 am
” “An attorney may not be held liable for failing to act outside the scope of the retainer” (Genesis Merchant Partners, L.P. v Gilbride, Tusa, Last & Spellane, LLC, 157 AD3d 479, 482; see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428). [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 2:11 pm
These branches of government are thus generally exempt from CPRA. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
The second period represents a time of flux for privilege as the executive branch wrestles with the fallout from Watergate and attempts to interpret and apply United States v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:30 am
Yesterday, thirteen judges of the Fourth Circuit sitting en banc heard argument in IRAP v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 4:02 am
“Where the release is unambiguous, a court may not look to extrinsic evidence to [*3]determine the parties’ intent” (Burgos v New York Presbyt. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 8:17 am
They also cite Sosa v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 4:42 am
State v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 9:00 pm
In fact after Brown v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 1:40 pm
In R. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 3:01 am
branch of government [Ilya Shapiro and James Knight on Cato amicus brief in Seila Law v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 3:55 pm
Citing People v. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
ATTORNEY-CLIENT ARBITRATIONA LA CARTE While the Supreme Court may have given a present to the legal profession by holding that such one-sided arbitration agreements are neither unconscionable nor against public policy -- which will no doubt be appreciated by Texas lawyers -- the ruling may also have opened up a can of worms, and may yet spur more appellate litigation over arbitration in the attorney-client context (and claim-splitting). [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 4:14 am
” At ACS, Sandra Park looks at Lynch v. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 7:32 pm
The case, Gundy v. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 12:17 pm
As people may intuitively suspect, this seems to be "fraud" only in a very limited sense. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 11:19 am
Kermarec v. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 6:10 am
The legal academy predominantly agrees that this doctrine from the Macomber case is both obsolete (dating back at least to Helvering v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 5:47 am
In Franklin v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 8:59 am
But perhaps not: Members of the President’s party in Congress may be able to prevent the Senate from holding pro forma sessions with the necessary frequency, and if the House and Senate disagree, the President may be able to adjourn both “to such Time as he shall think proper. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 9:01 am
United States v. [read post]
