Search for: "C. v. C."
Results 681 - 700
of 56,463
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2007, 5:36 am
Microsoft Corp., No. 99 C 626 (N.D. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 11:49 am
DWI Defendant allegedly had a .12 BAC however our St Louis DWI lawyers got the DWI charge amended to a C&I and were able to avoid any Missouri license suspension. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 7:51 am
In State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 8:39 am
Nixon, Rule 17(c), and Colorado’s privacy standards (People v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 7:22 am
The post In the Court w/c 27 May 2014 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 10:30 pm
Typically, Rule 17(c) subpoenas sought by defendants are scrutinized under the standard of United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 3:42 am
M’IntoshJustin C. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 10:52 am
ACCO Brands USA LLC v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 3:22 am
Strong Segurança SA v Município de Sintra and another (Case C-95/10); [2011] WLR (D) 99 “Article 47(2) of Parliament and Council Directive 2004/18/EC (permitting an economic operator participating in a public tendering process for the provision of services to rely on the capacities of other entities, provided that it could prove that it would have at its disposal the resources necessary) did not apply to contracts which had as their object services referred to… [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:45 am
Koelzsch v État du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg (Case C-29/10); [2011] WLR (D) 93 “Where an employee carries out activities in more than one contracting state the country in which the employee ‘habitually carries out his work in performance of the contract’, within the meaning of article 6(2)(a) of the Rome Convention on the law applicable to contractual obligations, was that in which or from which, in the light of all the factors which characterised… [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 2:22 am
Andersson v Staten genom Kronofogdemyndigheten i Jönköping, Tillsynsmynidigheten C-30/10; [2011] WLR (D) 44 “A provision of national law which excluded an employee from entitlement under the guarantee of payment of employees’ outstanding claims in the event of their employer’s insolvency, on the ground that the employee within the six months preceding the application for a declaration of insolvency had been the owner of an essential part of the… [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 8:08 pm
State v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 2:00 am
The post In the Supreme Court w/c 15 July 2014 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 9:33 pm
Sissel v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 8:50 am
On June 13, 2013, the Supreme Court announced its decision in United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 1:37 pm
C. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 8:50 am
On June 13, 2013, the Supreme Court announced its decision in United States v. [read post]
8 May 2011, 7:03 pm
C-SPAN -- The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals heard arguments in Drake v. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 12:28 am
The post In the Supreme Court w/c 21 October 2013 appeared first on UKSC blog. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 4:16 am
U.S. v. [read post]
