Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 681 - 700
of 7,356
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2011, 10:31 pm
The M/ V Cape Flattery had run aground on a submerged coral reef off Hawaii; the vessel entered into a salvage agreement with Titan Maritime that contained an arbitration clause: “Any dispute arising under this Agreement shall be settled by arbitration in London . . .in accordance with the English Arbitration Act 1996 . . ., English law and practice to apply. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 8:50 pm
In NAACP v. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 4:26 pm
Specifically, Mr Shao knew of increased costs, additional equipment lease expenses, delays in receiving payments from Chinese state-owned customers and increased costs of approximately A$1 million in preparing for the IPO. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 10:24 am
See A.A.M. v.. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 8:41 am
She was a native Spanish speaker, and spoke very little English. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 9:18 am
Let’s talk about the argument in Plain English. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 10:32 am
On appeal to the supreme court of the state, the judgment was affirmed [. . .].'” 1921—Kirby v. [read post]
31 Jul 2024, 3:00 am
But the English Court of Appeal has reversed it again, in line with the view of the UKIPO Hearing Officer. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:30 am
In Wayfair v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 12:54 am
Section 66 states that an arbitral award may "be enforced in the same manner as a judgment or order of the court to the same effect". [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 4:45 am
In Sulamerica Cia Nacional de Seguros Sa v Enesa Engenharia SA [2012] EWCA Civ 638, the Court of Appeal found that the decision of Mr Justice Cooke (previously reported here) that an anti-suit injunction in favour of arbitration proceedings was valid would be upheld.At first instance, Cooke J held that the arbitration agreement in question was governed by English, not Brazilian law and that the arbitration clause prevailed over the exclusive jurisdiction clause which specified that… [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 9:32 am
S. 420, 425, 427 (1984) (quoting United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 10:31 am
United States, 290 U.S. 13 (1933) (allowing a property owner to directly bring a Fifth Amendment claim for compensation upon the taking of the property, without pursuing, for example, the state-litigation requirement as contemplated in Williamson County)[13]; First English Evangelical Lutheran Church of Glendale v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 6:44 am
Koch v. [read post]
13 May 2012, 9:36 am
These vary from state to state but generally include fraud or non-disclosure of such information as mental illness, venereal disease, another marriage; impotency; and being under the legal age for marriage within that jurisdiction. (3) Legal annulments differ from religious annulments. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 6:05 am
Nov. 26, 1999) (awarding petitioner the cost of translating documents from German to English). [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 8:18 am
What is the English Court's solution to this conundrum? [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 12:12 pm
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Knox v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 6:31 am
In Hrvatska Elektroprivreda v Slovenia [ICSID Case No ARB/05/24 (6 May 2008)] the defendant, in an arbitration before the International Centre for the Settlement of Investments Disputes (ICSID) waited until one week before a substantive hearing, to disclose to the tribunal and the claimant, a list of lawyers who would be attending. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 10:40 am
In such cases, the principle has been accepted that an English court might be obliged to refuse to co-operate with a non-contracting state if to do so would be a “flagrant breach of Article 6”. [read post]
