Search for: "In Re AC"
Results 681 - 700
of 1,699
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2009, 7:19 am
Controlling Stockholders and Control Premiums - by Steven Haas, Hunton & Williams The ACS/Xerox $6.4 billion merger has received significant attention lately. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 4:07 am
" However, according to Kenji Kawada, senior analyst for Moody's Japan K.K, who is cited in the article, "[a] meaningful portion of the losses will flow to the global reinsurance industry,” with Munich Re, Swiss Re, Scor, Hannover Re, Berkshire Hathaway, PartnerRe and Everest Re being among the largest reinsurers with an interest in Japan. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 3:29 pm
Want to start off Law School already knowing how to brief your cases, Ace your Finals, and manage your time?! [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 11:53 am
ACS response: There's no scientific method that can tell you how to set a fee when you're using value billing, any more than there is a scientific method for determining your fee when you're billing hourly. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 2:07 pm
Em sua decisão, a ministra citou precedente (RE 606728-AgR), no qual a Primeira Turma do STF decidiu que acórdão (decisão colegiada) do Tribunal de Justiça do Distrito Federal e Territórios (TJDFT), que garantia a reserva de vagas para portadores de deficiência em concurso para provimento de cargos de agente penitenciário da Polícia Civil do DF, estava em harmonia com a jurisprudência da Suprema Corte. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:47 am
RECURSO INTERPOSTO ANTES DA PUBLICAÇÃO DO ACÓRDÃO. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 6:25 pm
It also required ACS was to file a petition for a permanency hearing. [read post]
5 Jan 2013, 6:21 am
En 2011 había hecho lo mismo, se puede ver acá.Previously on. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 4:13 am
" In re Vox Populi Registry Ltd., Serial Nos. 86700941 and 87187215 (October 29, 2020) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas W. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 11:23 am
In the case of Ace v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 5:18 pm
Where they come into conflict, “an intense focus on the comparative importance of the specific rights being claimed in the individual case is necessary” (In re S (A Child) ([2005] 1 AC 593, at [17]). [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 3:57 am
The House of Lords in the British Broadcasting Corporation case [2010] 1 AC 145 appeared to be in no doubt that Article 8 conferred a right to reputation that must be balanced, in an appropriate case, against the rights conferred by Article 10: see Lord Hope at [22] and [28] and Lord Brown at [69]. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 6:31 pm
"In the long run, that won't be changed at all, and will very much help them get out of the current chasm they're in. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 2:17 am
Re? [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 4:19 pm
Lord Steyn emphasised in Re S (A Child) [2005] 1 AC 593 HL at [17] that, in such a case, there were four generally applicable propositions to be derived from the Naomi Campbell case: “First, neither article has as such precedence over the other. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 1:08 pm
Recurso Extraordinário (RE) 460320 Relator: Min. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 2:23 am
At least that’s what you’re supposed to be doing. [read post]
20 Jan 2013, 5:54 am
Nuestro post acá. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 3:51 pm
Ms B’s first argument failed.On whether the Judge should have heard oral evidence, Ms B submitted that even if the appeal hearing was effectively a judicial review, this should not have prevented the Judge hearing oral evidence and in the circumstances this would have been the appropriate course.While it is, as a matter of principle, open to a Judge in a judicial review to permit parties to adduce oral evidence, following O’Reilly v Mackman [1983] 2 AC 237, this should only be… [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 3:51 pm
Ms B’s first argument failed.On whether the Judge should have heard oral evidence, Ms B submitted that even if the appeal hearing was effectively a judicial review, this should not have prevented the Judge hearing oral evidence and in the circumstances this would have been the appropriate course.While it is, as a matter of principle, open to a Judge in a judicial review to permit parties to adduce oral evidence, following O’Reilly v Mackman [1983] 2 AC 237, this should only be… [read post]
