Search for: "Minus v. State" Results 681 - 700 of 881
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2022, 12:38 pm by Drew Falkenstein
The Florida Department of Health, CDC, public health and regulatory officials in several other states, and the U.S. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 11:30 am
It would be hard to find a business dissolution case with messier facts and thornier legal issues than Tal v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 6:56 pm by Jake Ward
  Earlier this year, the USPTO announced an interim recalculation procedure to comply with the Federal Circuit Decision in Wyeth v. [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 4:03 pm by Ryan McKeen
In 2015, I achieved one of the highest settlements in the State of Connecticut – 2.25 million. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 11:02 am
 The case is Oracle v UsedSoft, in which Europe's top court is being invited to rule on whether downloaded software may be traded as "used". [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 4:54 am
The minus is due to the wrongheaded decisions of one state supreme court and a federal district court ignoring state precedent, undermining the learned intermediary rule in a couple of smaller states.The A is due to the number of states that have adopted the learned intermediary rule since the mid-1980s. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 6:30 am by Thom Lambert
If the penalty exceeds out-of-pocket expenses (policy price minus available subsidies), then it makes sense to purchase insurance. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 3:32 am by Peter Mahler
Ruvoldt’s initial email on March 26, 2015 at 9:58 a.m. stated inter alia that Sullivan would need to “formally withdraw,” that “[Sullivan’s] interest will be set as assets minus liabilities at Midnight 3/31,” and that Ruvoldt will “manage the wind down. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 8:00 am by Orin Kerr
The Supreme Court recently agreed to hear an important electronic privacy case, United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 1:02 pm by Randall Reese
While Healthcare Finance Group asserts in Friday's notice that these claimed events of default would provide the DIP lenders to declare a "Termination Date" under the court's final DIP financing order (paragraph 8) and to assert rights and remedies as a result of the occurrence of a Termination Date, the notice expressly states that it is "not intended to state a Termination Date, which right is expressly reserved. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 9:08 pm by Andrew Schaengold
On March 31, the Supreme Court heard argument in the case of NCAA v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 1:53 pm by admin
” The State of Texas filed a complaint in the United States Supreme Court, in an attempt to invoke that court’s original jurisdiction to adjudicate Texas’ complaint that it was harmed by voting procedures in four states in which Trump lost the popular vote. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 1:53 pm by Schachtman
” The State of Texas filed a complaint in the United States Supreme Court, in an attempt to invoke that court’s original jurisdiction to adjudicate Texas’ complaint that it was harmed by voting procedures in four states in which Trump lost the popular vote. [read post]