Search for: "NOBLE V. STATE" Results 681 - 700 of 914
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2012, 9:33 am by WSLL
Denny Moffett of Moffett & Associates, PC, Jackson, Wyoming; and Heather Noble, Jackson, Wyoming. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 7:18 am
” Comments against the government action came from the American Booksellers Association, The Authors Guild, and e-book retailers Barnes & Noble and Apple.Approximately 70 of the 868 comments favored the suit and settlement. [read post]
14 Apr 2013, 5:20 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
– You can also buy my book in print at Amazon.com or as an ebook for the Kindle, the Nook from Barnes and Noble or through Hyperink. [read post]
10 Dec 2006, 9:15 pm
  They said all sorts of noble things. [read post]
22 Jun 2008, 2:16 pm
As none other than Michael Mukasey argued at the time (Padilla v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 11:02 am
 The case is Oracle v UsedSoft, in which Europe's top court is being invited to rule on whether downloaded software may be traded as "used". [read post]
27 Jul 2024, 6:15 am by Lawrence Solum
His pioneering contrarianism made it acceptable to believe that the Court should side with liberty against encroachments by both state and federal government. [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 1:18 pm by Jon
(Actually, he overlooked military crimes, but those only applied to military and militia when in federal service, and were a kind of private law.)However, in United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 11:21 pm by Frank Cranmer
The most recent example is the Grand Chamber case of S, V and A v Denmark [GC], nos. 35553/12 and 2 others, 22 October 2018. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 1:22 pm by Jeff Gamso
  Justice White set out the difference in roles as clearly as anyone ever has, with emphasis on our special duty, in United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 1:46 am
Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: Haney v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 2:39 am by SHG
  And the Supreme Court shouldn't stick its nose into states' rules that would put a man to death without review because a law office, even one with as much mahogany and marble as Sullivan & Cromwell, screwed up.Justice Scalia made the point more clearly in Holland v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 6:13 am by Beth Graham
Barnes & Noble, 763 F.3d 1171, 1175-76 (9th Cir. 2014)); see also, Van Tassell v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 4:00 am by Steve McConnell
In both decisions, Judge Posner was on a panel with Chief Judge Easterbrook, so the intellectual lineup behind the opinions was as strong and fearsome as Billy Williams batting after Banks.Let’s start with United States v. [read post]