Search for: "People v. Superior Court" Results 681 - 700 of 3,299
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2017, 7:36 am by John Rubin
A short opinion issued recently by the Court of Appeals, State v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 5:17 am by Matt Sundquist
Superior Court, the Court explained that “the value of openness lies in the fact that people not actually attending trials can have confidence that standards of fairness are being observed; the sure knowledge that anyone is free to attend gives assurance that established procedures are being followed and that deviations will become known. [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 6:37 pm by APransky
Town of Wayland, Middlesex Superior Court (No. 14-6717) (August 13, 2014.) [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 3:10 pm by Justin P. Walsh
There was an interesting article on the Seattle Times website today regarding the Superior Court reversing an arbitrator decision regarding releasing the names of officers disciplined for misconduct. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 1:38 pm by Ana Muñoz
  The judge who heard the case in the Superior Court agreed, and denied the motion on that basis. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 6:36 am
Some 2,000 individual plaintiffs filed a complaint in the Superior Court of the U.S. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 6:34 am by Nassiri Law
Additional Resources: Spokane Valley Fire Captain Terminated for Religious Messages Can Sue, State Supreme Court Finds, Jan. 26. 2018, By Ryan Collingwood, The Spokesman-Review Sprague v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 2:18 pm by Giles Peaker
Secondly: in the second part of the decision in Khan, the Court of Appeal resolved the tension between Avon Ground Rents Ltd v Child (2018) UKUT 204 (LC) and John Romans Park Homes Ltd v Hancock, 17 October 2019 (His Honour Judge Martin Rodger KC), unreported. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 5:12 pm by Earl Drott
While there are grounds for vacating unfavorable verdicts in car accident cases, courts do not grant such requests lightly, as demonstrated in a recent Texas case, Mark Mandel v. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 6:13 am by John Jascob
The state has no compelling interest in censoring speech it finds “repugnant,” the court wrote, and the First Amendment does not allow remedying unwanted speech with enforced silence (Honeyfund.com, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 11:21 pm
Last Wednesday the feds indicted Pennsylvania Superior Court (i.e., appellate court) Judge Michael T. [read post]