Search for: "People v. Ing" Results 681 - 700 of 1,531
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am by Bexis
Aren’t there a bunch of plaintiffs out there suing Eli Lilly because its anti-schizophrenia drug, Zyprexa supposedly causes diabetes – at least in obese people who would probably contract the disease anyway? [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 9:29 am by Jeffrey P. Hermes
The above text basically tells officers to investigate people engaging in an activity that is constitutionally protected and deserving of no special police attention. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm by Samuel Estreicher
In the court’s view, “[t]his language plainly demonstrates that the requisite impact [“depriv[ing] or tend[ing] to deprive any individual of employment opportunities or adversely affect[ing] his status as an employee”] must befall an individual with ‘status as an employee’. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Indeed, this is what happened in Governors Ridge Office Park Association v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am by Eugene Volokh
There cannot be a rule under which "poor people ... have their speech enjoined, while the rich are allowed to speak so long as they pay damages. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 6:06 am by Ambassador P. Michael McKinley (ret.)
It includes constructing “a full record of wrongdoing; pursu[ing] deterrence through consequences for wrongdoing; rebuild[ing] prescriptive norms of acceptable political behavior; and generat[ing] shared narratives. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 6:12 am by Dennis Crouch
The claimed method of “collect[ing] information on a user’s movements and location history [and] electronically record[ing] that data” (i.e., “creating a digital travel log”), is ineligible as a form of “managing personal behavior or relationships or interactions between people. [read post]