Search for: "Phillips v. United States" Results 681 - 700 of 1,060
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2011, 7:55 am by Oliver Gayner, Olswang
  Defendants in Iraq oil for food case failed with appeal that criminal offences created by Government pursuant to s.1 United Nations Act 1946 were ultra vires because they were not created “promptly” Patmalneice v SOS Work & Pensions [2011] [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 11:08 pm by Marie Louise
(Class 99) (Afro-IP)   United Kingdom EWHC (Ch): Plane users can’t tell airlines from airways: United Airlines Inc v United Airways Limited (IPKat) PPC page 32: Quickstep – are there difficulties changing course with 8 tentacles? [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 10:06 am by Christopher Brown, Matrix.
Bloomsbury International Ltd v Sea Fish Industry Authority and DEFRA [2011] UKSC 25 has its origins in a claim brought by importers unhappy with the imposition of a levy. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 2:15 pm by Dwight Sullivan
CAAF’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:56 pm
("ACI") appeals from the final judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:59 am by Charlotte Law Library
Lyle Dennison, reporter for the SCOTUSblog (Supreme Court of the United States Blog), stated in his blog dated June 20th, 2011 that it appears that each woman in the class-action suit in Dukes v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 6:07 pm
Prospect, IL 60056-5788 AMERICAN SERVICE FINANCE CORPORATION DBA MERCHANTS INTERSTATE COLLECTION AGENCY 640 PLAZA DR STE 310 HIGHLANDS RANCH, CO 80129 AMERIQUEST RECOVERY SERVICES LLC 1845 HIGHWAY 93 SOUTH STE 310 KALISPELL, MT 59901 AMSHER COLLECTION SERVICES INC 600 BEACON PKY STE 300 BIRMINGHAM, AL 35209 APEX FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT LLC 1120 LAKE COOK RD BUFFALO GROVE, IL 60089 APOLLO CREDIT AGENCY INC DBA WESTERN RECOVERY INC DBA ULTRACHEK INC 3501 S TELLER ST LAKEWOOD, CO… [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 6:07 pm
Prospect, IL 60056-5788 AMERICAN SERVICE FINANCE CORPORATION DBA MERCHANTS INTERSTATE COLLECTION AGENCY 640 PLAZA DR STE 310 HIGHLANDS RANCH, CO 80129 AMERIQUEST RECOVERY SERVICES LLC 1845 HIGHWAY 93 SOUTH STE 310 KALISPELL, MT 59901 AMSHER COLLECTION SERVICES INC 600 BEACON PKY STE 300 BIRMINGHAM, AL 35209 APEX FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT LLC 1120 LAKE COOK RD BUFFALO GROVE, IL 60089 APOLLO CREDIT AGENCY INC DBA WESTERN RECOVERY INC DBA ULTRACHEK INC 3501 S TELLER ST LAKEWOOD, CO… [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 11:49 am by Dwight Sullivan
This week at the CCAs:  AFCCA will hear oral argument at 1000 tomorrow in United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 2:54 am by Marie Louise
Crowdsourcing commercialised (IPKat) P2P (seminar): the aftermath (IPKat) Hargreaves Review (Kluwer Patent Blog)   United States US Patents Microsoft joins Article One’s new preemptive troll-fighting service (The Prior Art)   US Patents – Decisions Supreme Court affirms high standard of proving patents invalid – Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Limited Partnership (Electronic Frontier Foundation) (Patent Arcade) (Patently-O)  (IPBiz) (IAM) (IPBiz)… [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 11:30 pm by Matthew Hill
For Lord Phillips, and the other five judges in the majority, the Mirror Principle won out [62, per Lord Phillips]: “It would not be satisfactory for the Coroner to conduct an inquest that did not satisfy the requirements of Article 2, leaving open the possibility of the appellants making a claim against the United Kingdom before the Strasbourg Court. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 8:41 am by Dwight Sullivan
  The deadline for either a cert petition or request for additional time to file a cert petition in United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 3:13 pm by Adrian Lurssen
Supreme Court's recent decision in Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 4:13 pm
A United States patent is presumed valid under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
30 May 2011, 11:37 pm by Aileen McColgan, Matrix.
The decision in McCaughey will not impose a Human Rights Act obligation on the state to investigate pre-commencement deaths, as had been argued in McKerr. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am by Edward Craven, Matrix Chambers.
This was the riddle that recently occupied a nine-judge panel of the Supreme Court in R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18. [read post]