Search for: "Royal v. State" Results 681 - 700 of 2,233
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2014, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court granted review in United States v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 8:07 am by Muneer Awad
Muneer Awad is the plaintiff who filed the lawsuit against the State of Oklahoma in Awad v. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 5:30 am by Kevin
If he did return, the current royal family doesn’t seem to have noticed. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 1:37 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (SG & Ors) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions,heard 29-30 April. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 2:42 pm by Jeremy
The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) gave its ruling this morning in Case C‑572/13, Hewlett-Packard Belgium SPRL v Reprobel SCRL, intervener Epson Europe BV, a request for a preliminary ruling under from the Cour d’appel de Bruxelles (Court of Appeal, Brussels, Belgium). [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 6:05 am
Electing the head of a state has turned into a political game; Brown v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 1:38 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang LLP
These arguments were rejected by Vos J who stated that the Prince should not receive special treatment in English litigation, and the order stood. [read post]
9 May 2011, 2:03 am by Blog Editorial
R (McDonald) v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, heard 4 – 5 April 2011. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 4:34 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
” For example, in Fiore v Oakwood Plaza Shopping Ctr., Inc. (164 AD2d 737 [1st Dept 1991], affd 78 NY2d 572 [1991]), the Court ruled that an out-of-state judgment by confession is entitled to accelerated treatment under CPLR 3213. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 9:31 am
  Chevron has repeatedly stated that it has no duty to stop the gas flaring.[10] III. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 2:28 pm by Matthew David Brozik
In fact, in complete contradiction to what I touted at the outset, Forest Park Pictures v. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Second, the Court will hear Royal Mail Group Ltd v Efobi. [read post]