Search for: "Scalia v. United States"
Results 681 - 700
of 4,639
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2019, 8:27 pm
United States, the double jeopardy/dual sovereignty case. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 1:11 pm
Ohio, United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 4:48 pm
” The grocers could show that they kept the data from the public and their competitors, and that USDA assured them it would keep the information private (as the United States stated in its amicus brief and during oral argument). [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 8:34 am
First up was United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 7:30 am
Or consider another example: in United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 3:43 pm
Referring to Justice Antonin Scalia’s famous language from Whitman v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 9:02 am
Background: State Sovereign Immunity The Eleventh Amendment to the Constitution provides: “The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 7:26 am
Johnson and United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 8:40 am
The Supreme Court has already directly borrowed this principle in analyzing the scope of congressional contempt power, stating in Anderson v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 7:00 am
As Schleicher notes, Vermont has a smaller population than 28 cities in the United States (including Austin, Texas, whose metropolitan area is approximately three times the population of Vermont) and 107 counties. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
Although Schaeffer was vehemently anti-Catholic, he shared on important meta-view with some Catholics, which is the desirability of an "integral" connection between church and state, for the simple reason that it is only God's sovereignty that in fact legitimizes the State, and, therefore, it is the duty of the state to adhere to Divine Command. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 9:01 am
In 2013, the United States Supreme Court considered the issue. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 7:44 am
" United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 4:47 am
Kopf Senior United States District Judge (Nebraska) [i] The assertion that juries, not judges, were uniformly responsible for sentencing at the time of the Founding, which assertion formed the foundation for blowing up the Guidelines and various state sentencing schemes, is flatly wrong as a historical matter. [read post]
1 Jun 2019, 7:36 am
United States. [read post]
31 May 2019, 6:00 am
Apart from his ACA decisions, in his dissent in Obergefell v. [read post]
29 May 2019, 9:01 pm
United States, 340 F. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 8:54 am
Justice Antonin Scalia’s partial dissent in U.S. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 5:29 am
This focused on the three-step test of the Eli Lilly v Actavis UK Supreme Court decision and the subsequent UK cases applying that test. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 8:37 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
