Search for: "Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog" Results 681 - 700 of 1,296
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2025, 6:31 am by David Oxenford
  In actions by the new Chairman, Carr sent a letter to Comcast and NBCUniversal informing them that the FCC’s Enforcement Bureau will investigate their DEI programs to see if they promote “invidious forms of discrimination in violation of FCC regulations and civil rights laws. [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 1:47 pm by INFORRM
  The Court refused a rehearing request by plaintiffs, who are minors, who sought to pursue their civil rights discrimination suit against a school system anonymously. [read post]
28 May 2015, 10:45 am by Maureen Johnston
§ 1983 authorizes the imposition of supervisory liability on state officials for a subordinate’s alleged constitutional violation; and (2) whether the Third Circuit erred in holding that there is a clearly established right under the Eighth Amendment to the “proper implementation of adequate suicide prevention protocols. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm by Mary Dwyer
Pinholster, which held that habeas review is limited to the record that was before the state court; and (3) whether the decision of the Second Circuit affords the state court the deference required by 28 U.S.C § 2254(d), as interpreted by this Court in Harrington v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 11:57 am by Dale Carpenter
But suppose the litigation fails, either in the Ninth Circuit or at the Supreme Court. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 11:25 am by Cicely Wilson
Richbourg, et al., 8th Cir. (7/23/14)Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Government & Administrative LawPlaintiff, both individually and as the administrator of Bradley Gladden’s estate, filed suit against officers and the police chief, alleging that the officers violated Bradley’s rights under 42 U.S.C. 1983 and the Arkansas Civil Rights Act, Ark. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 9:33 am
Based on this exhaustive review, the conclusion is unmistakable: in constitutional cases, Judge Sotomayor is solidly in the mainstream of the Second Circuit. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 5:12 am
Judge Sullivan rejected the plaintiffs' allegations that the defendants violated their Fifth Amendment rights by failing to advise plaintiffs at their hearings of their right to remain silent. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 4:45 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Human Rights at Home blog, Martha Davis notes that “[i]mportantly for US human rights activists, the opinion took human rights law seriously. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 11:05 am by Andrew Flusche
The police send the names of the suspect individuals to the Commonwealth’s Attorney, who then files a civil petition in the Circuit Court to get an order of interdiction. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 4:36 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Jonathan Blanks argues that “qualified immunity effectively guts the best civil rights protection in federal law and, more broadly, police officers must be held accountable for their unconstitutional actions. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 6:14 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
”  The answer, as it turns out, is likely to resolve a circuit split, as the Fifth, Sixth, and Seventh Circuits are lining up with the Ninth Circuit’s approach, while the Second, Third, and Fourth Circuits have generally disagreed and have required an actual, concrete injury to have standing. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 3:03 am by Lyle Denniston
There are many challenges to the plan from state and local governments, and an array of civil rights groups. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
  In addition to common-law claims, this plaintiff creatively asserted a civil rights claim under 42 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 9:05 pm by Matthew Chagares
Bruen opinion to reach its result, emphasizing that Second Amendment rights are not absolute. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 7:29 am by John Elwood
Green retired, instituted mandatory administrative proceedings with an EEO counselor, and then filed suit against the Postmaster General alleging, among other things, constructive discharge in violation of title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. [read post]