Search for: "Securities Co. v. United States"
Results 681 - 700
of 3,587
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2010, 7:02 am
In Apache v. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 5:16 am
In United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm
And time and again, those courts determined that the transactions at issue—ranging from investment opportunities in oil barrels to fishing boats to silver foxes—did in fact constitute the offer or sale of securities.[8] And then in 1946, the Supreme Court issued its seminal opinion in SEC v. [read post]
24 May 2021, 9:36 pm
United National Life Ins. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 6:56 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 3:12 pm
However, in Holder v. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 4:23 pm
Judge Atlas found that the language of the Dodd-Frank Anti-Retaliation Provision is silent about its extraterritorial applicability and held that there is a “presumption that the Provision does not govern conduct outside the United States. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 4:23 pm
Judge Atlas found that the language of the Dodd-Frank Anti-Retaliation Provision is silent about its extraterritorial applicability and held that there is a “presumption that the Provision does not govern conduct outside the United States. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm
But in a recent ruling, in Sessions v. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 12:36 pm
Co., 4 NY3d 332, 339 [2005]; Security Mut. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 5:58 am
United States, 585 U.S. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 6:00 pm
USCIS Guidance Following DACA Permanent Injunction in State of Texas, et al., v. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 6:00 am
New Hampshire has the highest level of outbound smuggling at 65 percent of consumption, likely due to its relatively low tax rates and proximity to high-tax states in the northeastern United States. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 12:41 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 8:27 am
This is both a violation of the original understanding of the United States Constitution and natural justice: In this case the right of the plaintiff which defendant is alleged to have infringed was the right to the security of his reputation. 'The security of his [or her] reputation or good name from the arts of detraction and slander,' Blackstone says, 'are rights to which every [person] is entitled by reason and natural justice; since without… [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 9:31 am
Monsanto Co., 133 S. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 6:15 am
Barron v. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
Securities and Exchange Commission on June 16, 2022. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 3:57 pm
John Larimer, United States Navy cryptologist. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 3:00 am
United States, a challenge by two Maine men to their convictions for possession of a firearm after a domestic violence conviction. [read post]
