Search for: "Smith v. State"
Results 681 - 700
of 11,004
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2023, 4:35 pm
The Guardian and BBC also report a demonstration at the Osbourne-Rogers wedding which Just Stop Oil has stated was not organised by them. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
[The Supreme Court's misguided decision to grant Lorie Smith standing to pursue her entirely hypothetical claim against the State of Colorado in the web designer case.] [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176, 180 [1978]). [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176, 180 [1978]). [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
In contrast to Smith’s approach, judge-shopping from the start in Missouri v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 8:10 am
State v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 9:08 am
The Tenth Circuit ruled in favor of the state, but the U.S. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 7:32 am
Nev. 2022); see also Smith v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Decided on June 30, 2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., LINDLEY, CURRAN, MONTOUR, AND OGDEN, JJ. 329 CA 22-00889 IN THE MATTER OF ARBITRATION BETWEEN COUNTY OF ONONDAGA, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, AND and CIVIL SERVICE EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION, INC., ONONDAGA COUNTY LOCAL 834, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Decided on June 30, 2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., LINDLEY, CURRAN, MONTOUR, AND OGDEN, JJ. 329 CA 22-00889 IN THE MATTER OF ARBITRATION BETWEEN COUNTY OF ONONDAGA, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, AND and CIVIL SERVICE EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION, INC., ONONDAGA COUNTY LOCAL 834, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 4:30 am
In the case of Hinerman v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 4:24 am
The Colorado business owner in 303 Creative v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 3:35 am
There is much to unpack in the Supreme Court’s decision in 303 Creative LLC v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 9:54 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
Griswold v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 10:27 am
Making race-based jury selection decisions in violation of Batson v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:14 pm
Smith stated she was happy to work with gays. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 2:11 pm
Similarly, while the narrow holding was that the law at issue was unconstitutional because it allowed some nonconsensual recordings -- particularly, body-worn cameras by police officers -- but not others, most state laws contain the same exceptions.So for states -- including California -- with two-party consent statutes, if the opinion stands, I doubt that most of them would survive. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 11:11 am
Such a claim would trivialize free speech protection in the way that the Court in Rumsfeld v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia Ben Roberts-Smith will pay defendants’ legal costs in his failed defamation case, ABC reports. [read post]
