Search for: "State v. Kent"
Results 681 - 700
of 1,508
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2015, 10:40 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 11:26 am
For example, in Livingston v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 6:48 am
Yesterday’s decision in Yates v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 4:13 am
Next week’s oral arguments in King v. [read post]
21 Feb 2015, 4:47 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 7:18 am
It rotates among BC, Chicago-Kent, San Diego, and Kansas, and is typically held in April. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 2:05 pm
On January 14, 2015, the Supreme Court heard oral argument inJennings v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 5:59 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger criticizes comments by Attorney General Eric Holder about Glossip v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 9:33 am
In one of Winslow’s last major cases, State v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 5:19 am
Oral arguments in King v. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 3:36 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger observes that Toca v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 3:47 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger agrees that vacating Toca’s conviction for second-degree murder was “a proper disposition. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm
Opposition is growing over State Government plans to extend defamation laws. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 2:46 am
Commentary on the decision comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 4:07 am
Jacobs covers last week’s grant in Horne v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 3:57 am
Briefly: At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidgger weighs in on Whitfield v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 6:00 am
Law Society of British Columbia and Black v. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 4:41 am
News) reports that Bobby Chen, the pro se petitioner in Chen v. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 3:40 am
In Heien v. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 6:26 pm
Then follows an alternative provision that in default of appointment the property shall go unto such person or persons living at the death of the said party of the first part, and being her heir or heirs at law, as would be entitled to take the same by descent from her in case the same was land belonging to her, situate in the state of New York, and, if more than one person, then in the proportion in that behalf prescribed by the laws of said state. [read post]
