Search for: "State v. Harding" Results 681 - 700 of 16,013
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2015, 2:41 pm by Amy Howe
Holder – no state or local government is currently required to obtain preclearance at all. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 1:59 pm by Unknown
Find all of the latest updates at narf.org/nill/bulletins/Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2020.htmlUnited States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 1:48 pm by David Super
       By contrast, if a convention follows the ratification process under Article V, any change would require approval of thirty-eight state legislatures or state conventions. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 11:35 am
 After this morning's opinion, you'll presumably hear it a lot.The hard part, however, will be explaining why today's opinion is authored by Judge Ikuta. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 12:00 am by Orin Kerr
On December 5th, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in a Fourth Amendment case, Messerschmidt v. [read post]
Murray reflected on the questions asked by the justices, stating “You don’t do hard things without asking hard questions. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Last week the Virginia legislature ratified the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA), thus becoming the 38th state to do so and satisfying Article V’s threshold (three quarters of the states) for an amendment to become part of the Constitution. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 11:01 pm by Orin Kerr
The delay question came up in passing in Footnote 3 of United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 2:24 pm
            A recent United States Supreme Court decision has forced the United States to take a hard look at the worldwide global warming phenomenon, and the U.S.'s contributions thereto. [1] In Massachusetts v. [read post]
27 May 2016, 11:23 am
 Never seeming to do anything right no matter how hard it tries.Though, if the analogy were to hold, the Ninth Circuit would have already graduated high school by now. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 10:01 am by Eugene Volokh
U.S. (1935) (although a prosecutor "may strike hard blows, [she] is not at liberty to strike foul ones"); U.S. v. [read post]