Search for: "State v. Harding"
Results 681 - 700
of 16,324
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2022, 1:38 pm
See United States v. [read post]
3 May 2009, 10:21 pm
You'll recall that when the new, broader standard for government takings came down in Kelo v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 12:32 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circle has decided on the interesting and important case of MDY v Blizzard. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 1:59 pm
Find all of the latest updates at narf.org/nill/bulletins/Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2020.htmlUnited States v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 5:26 pm
State v. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 12:55 am
This hard lesson was brought home again in a newly decided case in the First Department, Diaz v. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 5:04 am
You've got to figure she's had a hard life with that last name. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 1:56 pm
United States, 530 U. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 1:48 pm
By contrast, if a convention follows the ratification process under Article V, any change would require approval of thirty-eight state legislatures or state conventions. [read post]
7 May 2012, 9:34 am
Crosby v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 4:52 am
United States of America, from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, ExxonMobil learned the hard way that filing amended tax returns can be very costly. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 3:16 am
As hard as it may be to imagine, the most significant force against the reform of failed criminal justice programs have been the unions, and the politicians who depend on them for financing, representing prison guards. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 12:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 8:54 am
Following this court’s logic, it will be hard for any app that does geotargeting to argue otherwise. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 1:54 am
The states have followed this logic in death penalty cases. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 7:46 am
I saw this opinion, California v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 7:46 am
I saw this opinion, California v. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 11:12 am
It would therefore be hard to imagine a case in which a district court, after a court of appeals vacated a criminal sentence, could properly increase the sentence based on an error the appeals court left uncorrected because of the cross-appeal rule. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 7:59 am
Drake v. [read post]
2 Dec 2007, 8:23 am
United States v. [read post]
