Search for: "State v. Holder"
Results 681 - 700
of 8,260
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2022, 2:22 pm
It is hosted by Völkerrechtsblog and brilliantly co-organized by Justine Batura (Völkerrechtsblog), Anna Sophia Tiedeke (Völkerrechtsblog) and Michael Riegner (University of Erfurt; co-founder of the Völkerrechtsblog), who will feature as guest editor of the Symposium. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 9:13 pm
The tireless, tiresome tire maker is still in a state of denial and filed a motion yesterday with the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for a 30-day extension of time to file its second petition for rehearing en banc (full-court review) of the dismissal of Continental v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 2:45 pm
In the wake of Oil States Energy Servs., LLC v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 6:07 am
In Rodriguez v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 2:00 pm
New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 5:36 am
Permit holders were responsible for purchasing the devices. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:54 am
It is hosted by Völkerrechtsblog and brilliantly co-organized by Justine Batura (Völkerrechtsblog), Anna Sophia Tiedeke (Völkerrechtsblog) and Michael Riegner (University of Erfurt; co-founder of the Völkerrechtsblog), who will feature as guest editor of the Symposium. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 4:36 am
Registration v. acquisition is also a big deal. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 7:14 am
Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 9:25 am
In my personal observation, that makes a whole lot of sense, though I would encourage patent holders looking for additional enforcement venues in Europe to give consideration to Spain, particularly the Juzgado de lo mercantil no. 5 in Barcelona (Barcelona Commercial Court V), which is a rocket docket and where the standard applied to requests for injunctive relief is comparable to Germany (without the so-called injunction gap, as infringement and validity are adjudicated at the… [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 12:44 am
Here's some Ericsson v. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 12:37 am
You will find it stated in the law books that it is an offence to use language having a tendency to bring the Christian religion or the Bible into contempt; or to burn the Bible! [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 5:23 pm
” Despite the decision in Perilya v Nash [2015] NSWSC 706 there was a concern that the courts might interpret the model provision more narrowly outside of NSW. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 8:29 am
See, e.g., DeHart v. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 8:29 am
See, e.g., DeHart v. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 4:41 am
Weidner (pictured left), Dean Emeritus and Alumni Centennial Professor at Florida State University College of Law, and Daniel S. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 10:22 pm
In the Ericsson v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 9:07 pm
Matter of DCH Auto v Town of Mamaroneck 2022 NY Slip Op 03929 Decided on June 16, 2022 Court of Appeals Wilson Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 9:07 pm
Matter of DCH Auto v Town of Mamaroneck 2022 NY Slip Op 03929 Decided on June 16, 2022 Court of Appeals Wilson Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 7:23 pm
That is because federal law takes precedence over state laws. [read post]