Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Brown"
Results 681 - 700
of 3,742
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm
In People v Brown, 253 Mich 537; 235 NW 245 (1931), the Court noted that the right to keep and bear arms is subject to regulations, but stressed that such regulations “cannot constitutionally result in the prohibition of the possession of those arms which, by the common opinion and usage of law-abiding people, are proper and legitimate to be kept upon private premises for the [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 4:11 am
Lord Brown gave the leading judgment. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 7:35 am
So Roe v. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 7:44 pm
Brown v. [read post]
19 Jun 2010, 12:00 am
BROWN v. [read post]
[Sasha Volokh] How a state dentistry board hounded non-dentist teeth-whiteners out of North Carolina
28 Jan 2014, 10:01 am
Brown case from 1943. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 10:39 am
He formerly practiced as a member of the Supreme Court and appellate group at Mayer Brown LLP, and represented twenty-three law and history professors as amici in Varnum v. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 5:04 am
” As our country’s experience with stop-and-frisk vividly demonstrates, however, for police, reasonable suspicion is too often synonymous with being a Black or brown person in public.The practice of racially profiling Black drivers was effectively endorsed by the Court in the 1996 ruling in Whren v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 8:10 am
Brown (previously, Perry v. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 4:24 pm
Dew v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 4:37 am
United States v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 1:31 pm
McKee (Tribal Jurisdiction; Water Rights) Brown v. [read post]
11 May 2022, 1:09 pm
" Brown v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 12:46 pm
Kirtz and Murray v. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 6:06 pm
See Al-Adahi v. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 9:09 am
Dressed in brown leather aviator jacket, gold chain, hair down to shoulders United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 2:35 pm
The limits have been challenged before, but this case, Van Buren v. [read post]
28 May 2018, 10:43 am
The state of Ohio allows the penalty for those older than eighteen.A recent court decision in Commonwealth of Kentucky v. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 9:23 am
Neither does the status of the owner (living v. not living). [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 10:21 am
Blue Lake Rancheria Tribal Court (Jurisdiction – Exhaustion of Tribal Court Remedies)Jamul Action Committee v Jonodev Chaudhuri (Indian Lands Eligible for Gaming)Tanner-Brown v. [read post]
