Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Hughes"
Results 681 - 700
of 769
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2008, 8:03 am
, (IPRoo), WIPO Director General candidates’ presentations to members: (Intellectual Property Watch), IP rights arise in UN debate on the right to participate in cultural life: (Intellectual Property Watch), IP academies agree to galvanise efforts to promote IP education: (WIPO), What business people do to maximise protection of IP: (Ezine @rticles), Lorin Brennan’s memo on interaction between UNICITRAL guide and IP rights: (IP finance), … [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 5:04 am
Both writers argued in favour of the new single publication rule, which would bury the 160 year old common law authority, Duke of Brunswick v Harmer, that is the basis for the legal interpretation of every download of an online article as a new publication. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Law publishing industry veteran and innovator, Jason Wilson has been pondering on relevant matters as the case of ROSS v. [read post]
21 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
An Iowa high court opinion, State v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:15 pm
He's not just saying it would be a good idea to amend the law so there are penalties for copyfraud — many people say that. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 4:29 am
Scott Patterson, Siobhan Hughes and Sadie Gurman report for the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 6:47 am
Justin Hughes: fixation? [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 6:21 pm
Sellers, Hughes v. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 1:09 pm
Brock v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 9:39 am
Powell v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 5:14 am
Random House, Inc. and New Era Publications International ApS v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:50 am
It’s overly idealistic to act like, Oh, the Internet is the one place where people should be able to do whatever they wish: present child pornography, do scams, libel people, steal copyrighted material. [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:35 pm
However, she could pursue failure-to-hire claims under federal and local law, as well as retaliation claims based on allegations she was blacklisted and denied further appearances (Hughes v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 9:33 am
” Hugh Williamson: an express prohibition on ex post facto laws by states “may do good here, because the Judges can take hold of it. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 8:28 am
The wait is over: a judgment has been issued in the Philippines v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 10:51 am
Avoids problems of regulatory arbitrage. 230 v. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 7:35 am
This is elaborated a little more in the abstract: Pix credit hereABSTRACT: When the leaders of the United States and of the Peoples Republic of China refer to human rights, they invoke entirely different conceptions. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 1:52 pm
In this case, the trial judge had to bear in mind that he had already increased the damages for wrongful dismissal in accordance with Wallace v. [read post]
