Search for: "Thomas v. United States of America" Results 681 - 700 of 996
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jul 2022, 2:56 pm by INFORRM
The High Court has ruled that security and intelligence services must obtain “prior independent authorisation” to access individuals’ communication data from telecommunications companies (Liberty v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2022] EWHC 1630 (Admin)). [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 7:25 am by Rick
Some Americans — sadly, not so many — know that the United States of America did not always exist. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 10:24 am by Mark Walsh
’s opinion announcement in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 3:09 pm
United States, 505 U.S. 144, 156—159, 177 (1992). [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 7:23 am
This is a portion of United Cerebral Palsy's One-Stop Resource Guide. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am by John Elwood
Back in March, the Supreme Court invited the solicitor general to file a brief expressing the views of the United States on these cases. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 11:11 am by Anna Su
The common thread running throughout the essays in this book was the turn to law of each of these four groups: the Jehovah’s Witnesses, the Protestants and Other Americans United for the Separation of Church and State (POAU), the Nation of Islam, the Concerned Women for America (CWA) and the Religious Coalition for the Freedom to Marry (RCFM). [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
Md. 2012) (same); New York State Pesticide Coalition, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:00 pm
: (Danny Weitzner - Open Internet Policy), United States: How many lines is de minimis? [read post]
14 Jul 2024, 9:06 pm by Zachary S. Price
Developed by the British Parliament as a means of controlling the royal fiscal-military state, this practice of time-limited appropriations has been the norm in the United States since the beginning of the Republic. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 9:07 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the January 10 conference) Thomas More Law Center v. [read post]