Search for: "Windsor v. State"
Results 681 - 700
of 1,337
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2013, 2:31 pm
More importantly, the Defense of Marriage Act decision struck down a key component of DOMA in United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 8:18 am
The same day as Windsor, theCourt in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 7:50 am
U.S. v Windsor isn’t about so much about the individual rights of folks to marry but the rights of states to make rules that are at odds with the federal government. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:02 am
Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley In 2013, the Supreme Court ruled in United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 7:36 am
As the country's attention turns to next week's oral arguments before the Supreme Court in the Prop 8 case and the ACLU's challenge to DOMA in United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 8:41 am
Earlier this year, the Supreme Court's Decision in Windsor v. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 5:12 am
(Chief Justice Roberts made just this point in Windsor when he noted the limited impact of the Court’s conclusion about DOMA’s animus on state same-sex marriage prohibitions.) [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 4:44 am
” Relying on the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 6:00 am
Windsor two years ago. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 10:47 am
Windsor. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 3:52 pm
See Windsor Mount Joy Mut. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 9:55 am
Virginia decision arose from a criminal action appealed from a state supreme court, and the 2013 United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 1:13 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 1:18 pm
The case of Windsor v. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 8:22 am
” In support of this contention the DoJ cited the Supreme Court’s decision in Amchem Prods v Windsor which cautioned that Rule 23 of the Federal Rules for Civil Procedure (which sets out some of the requirements of a class action settlement) must not “carry the large load of restructuring legal regimes in the absence of congressional action” (see this AmeriKat letter for background to Rule 23). [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 9:30 am
Texas, United States v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 9:09 pm
Windsor. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 9:17 pm
Attorney General Schuette is correct to seek en banc review rather than intermediate appellate review from a 3-judge panel; why waste the time and resources.There is no doubt that this case, along with select others from across the nation, will be ultimately decided by the SCOTUS, as in the United States v Windsor. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 5:07 am
The proposed changes are intended to reflect (and expand upon) last year’s Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
