Search for: "California Law Review" Results 6981 - 7000 of 29,155
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2020, 6:00 am by Andrew Hamm
City of Bakersfield, California v. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
[The common law, the First Amendment, and California court rules provide a broad right of access to court documents.] [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 4:55 am by Hedge Fund Lawyer
  **** Offshore Matters Cayman Islands Mutual Funds Law (2020 Revision). [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 9:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
The April 2020 issue of the American Historical Review features a roundtable, "Chronological Age: A Useful Category of Historical Analysis," organized by Nicholas Syrett (University of Kansas) and Corinne Field (University of Virginia). [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 3:50 pm by skelly
In conjunction with the Locke Lord COVID-19 task force, we are reviewing, analyzing, and compiling regulatory updates to provide clients easy access to information during this unprecedented time. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 3:37 pm by Nicholas van Aelstyn and Zachary Norris
  This is not an unequivocal statement of the law, but instead represents our best interpretation of where things currently stand. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 3:09 pm by Nassiri Law
Contact the employment attorneys at Nassiri Law Group, practicing in Orange County, Riverside and Los Angeles. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 2:04 pm by Derek T. Muller
Additionally, it’s not “easy” or a “free pass”—students still have to graduate law school, and still must complete supervised practice, and still must pass the MPRE and the character and fitness review. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 10:39 am
," was completed last month with plans for publication in the University of California, Davis Law Review later this year. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 10:30 am by [email protected]
Dan Simon, a law and psychology expert at the University of Southern California Law School, said the paper is significant because “many people’s fates are determined by these tests. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 10:30 am by [email protected]
Dan Simon, a law and psychology expert at the University of Southern California Law School, said the paper is significant because “many people’s fates are determined by these tests. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 8:08 am by Dan Bressler
Eads, professor emerita of Southern Methodist University’s Dedman School of Law, who said she reviewed the issue and determined there’s no legal basis to disqualify Brewer. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 1:11 pm by Hedge Fund Lawyer
As discussed earlier, firms are reminded to review, revaluate, and update their BCPs in consideration of pandemic preparedness. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 12:50 pm by Gene Takagi
Adding to the complication, these laws do not necessarily conform with each other, particularly with respect to California where AB 5 went into effect at the start of this year. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 8:50 am by Anthony Zaller
  Moreover, the County is reviewing a potential ordinance setting forth which employees must be rehired after being laid off due to COVID-19. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 5:03 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Jamelia Morgan (University of Connecticut School of Law) has posted an abstract of Rethinking Disorderly Conduct (California Law Review, Forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 3:55 am by Edith Roberts
At The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket blog, Stephen Pershing calls the ruling “paradoxical[:] It violated the Court’s professed non-intervention value in order to enforce it[, a]nd it required thousands of voters to risk their and their fellow citizens’ health in order to avoid complete disenfranchisement. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 3:00 am by William W. Abbott
 For questions relating to this article or any other California land use, real estate, environmental and/or planning issues contact Abbott & Kindermann, Inc. at (916) 456-9595. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 4:59 pm by tvasil
California:  On April 13th, Commissioner Ricardo Lara issued Bulletin 2020-3, ordering insurers to make an initial premium refund for the months of March and April to all adversely impacted California policyholders in the below listed lines of insurance, as quickly as practicable, but in any event no later than 120 days after April 13. [read post]