Search for: "DEFENDER SECURITY COMPANY" Results 6981 - 7000 of 17,847
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2018, 9:32 am by William Ford
The administration deemed ceding this competitive edge to Huawei a threat to national security. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 4:11 pm by Kevin LaCroix
These problems led to the filing of the securities class action complaint against the company. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 2:33 pm by Jeff Rasansky
If a construction company fails to properly secure the area and/or take preventative measures such as using debris nets, toe boards, and personal protective equipment, they are simply opening themselves up to a negligence claim should someone become injured as a result. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 7:51 am by Ronald Mann
The 1933 Act requires companies that offer securities to the public to make accurate disclosures of relevant information. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 1:16 pm by Andrew Keane Woods
The Ninth Circuit recently held that “a defendant can run afoul of the CFAA when he or she has no permission to access a computer or when such permission has been revoked explicitly”—but not when that person merely overstays his or her welcome. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 10:16 am by Robert Chesney
Against that backdrop, last week’s multinational takedown of secure phone company Phantom Secure is quite interesting. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 6:30 am by Alina Polyakova
And Ukraine’s systems—defended by a combination of firewalls, segmented access, two-factor authentication, and manual controls—were more secure at the time of the attack than those in the United States. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 3:00 am by Sarah Moses and Spencer Persson
In doing so, the Zappos court rejected defendant’s argument that Krottner was no longer good law after Clapper v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 8:16 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
Recently, an appellate court issued an opinion in a car accident case involving a plaintiff who signed a waiver of liability in favor of the defendant insurance company. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 3:37 am
Wheet had engaged in securities fraud by issuing press release that had falsely portrayed the company as:a successful manufacturer of a safe and effective syringe slated for imminent mass production and distribution; andhaving secured significant sales agreements, including one with the U.S. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 1:40 am by John Hopkins
Should the company adopted BYOD program be a reasonable “shield” behind which the corporate defendant may hide from sanctions? [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 1:40 am by John Hopkins
Should the company adopted BYOD program be a reasonable “shield” behind which the corporate defendant may hide from sanctions? [read post]
18 Mar 2018, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
The Huffington Post has a piece explaining the background to the company. [read post]
18 Mar 2018, 1:14 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Private company D&O insurance policies typically include a Securities Liability exclusion; the wordings of these exclusions vary and in some instances might preclude coverage for claims against the company and its executives alleging violations of the securities laws. [read post]
18 Mar 2018, 10:06 am by Sabrina I. Pacifici
American intelligence agencies were aware of the attacks for the past year and a half, and the Department of Homeland Security and the F.B.I. first issued urgent warnings to utility companies in June. [read post]
17 Mar 2018, 12:00 am by Daniel Hamilton
The complaint alleged Horizon and Individual Defendants violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”) and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and Defendants violated Sections 11, 12(a)(2), and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (“Securities Act”). [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 12:00 am by Carlos Schidlow
In response, Defendants argued the management projections were forward-looking statements protected by the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (“PSLRA”). [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 12:00 am by Sydney Boyle
According to the allegations, the directors of PRM International, Inc. consciously disregarded multiple signs of possible violations of securities laws. [read post]