Search for: "In re F. E."
Results 6981 - 7000
of 7,242
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2007, 6:10 pm
(E) Employment. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 6:25 am
See In re All Matters Submitted To The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court ("In re FISC"), 218 F. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 7:59 am
You're an employer in Connecticut. [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 6:32 pm
"; rejection of alternative Section 2(f) claim of acquired distinctiveness (if the term is not generic)]. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 8:04 am
Vampire Nation, 451 F.3d 189 (3d Cir. 2006), the Court also rejected Ausburn's argument that the holding in United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 4:26 am
SCHOLL'S" and "AIR-PILLO" in CombinationSection 2(e)(1) - Mere Descriptiveness: Precedential No. 58: TTAB Affirms Disclaimer Requirement of "TOGGS" and 2(d) Refusal of "ZOGGS TOGGS" over "TOG & Design" for Swimsuits TTAB Deems "iPOSTAGE" Merely Descriptive of Internet Postage TTAB Reverses 2(e)(1) Descriptiveness Refusal of "FOLDOVER" for Web-Based Marketing Software TTAB Affirms 2(e)(1)… [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 11:38 am
Novartis Corp., 378 F. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 4:38 am
Scott, 317 F.3d 1133, 1138 (10th Cir.2003) ("[W]e review the district court's decision on equitable tolling of the limitation period for an abuse of discretion. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 5:12 am
§ 1030(e)(11). [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 12:37 am
Here's the verbatim language:(e) Except as provided by Subsection [(f) or] (g), the commission shall discharge from its custody a person not already discharged on the person's 19th [21st] birthday.The only exception, subsection g, says that:The commission shall transfer a person who has been sentenced under a determinate sentence to ... [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 10:39 pm
’” VFB, 482 F.3d at 636 (quoting In re Prince, 85 F.3d 314, 320 (7th Cir. 1996)).In Iridium, the Court was presented with two quite different approaches to the presentation of valuation evidence. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 1:25 pm
In order that demonstrators not interfere with the operation of the University or the rights of others, they shall not:a. obstruct vehicular, bicycle, pedestrian, or other traffic; b. obstruct entrances or exits to buildings or driveways;c. interfere with educational activities inside or outside the building;d. harass passersby or otherwise disrupt normal activities;e. interfere with or preclude a scheduled speaker from being heard;f. interfere with scheduled University ceremonies… [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 8:31 am
View the article here | PDF TextNotice this document says ALL CITIZENS or ALL PEOPLE and doesn't make any distinctions of criminal history or anything else. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 3:06 am
Lee Barrett of E-Everything for Bankruptcy Lawyers... might be a process juror. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 3:06 am
Lee Barrett of E-Everything for Bankruptcy Lawyers... might be a process juror. [read post]
22 Sep 2007, 10:01 am
In the latest case addressing this issue, In re Echostar Communications Corp. 448 F.3d 1294 (Fed. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 11:50 pm
" In re Kemmler, 136 U.S. 86, 101,2 L. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 11:35 pm
P. 9.200(f), requests that this Court grant this motion to supplement the record. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 12:02 pm
In re Watson, 517 F.2d 465, 472 & n.2 (Cust. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 4:05 am
Molina Martinez, --- F.3d ----, 2007 WL 2285324 (5th Cir. [read post]
