Search for: "J. C."
Results 6981 - 7000
of 19,483
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2016, 11:22 am
C’est à tout le moins la position défendue par Getty Images, Inc. [read post]
3 May 2016, 10:28 am
Brown, Gerald J. [read post]
3 May 2016, 3:50 am
The courts where a divorce case between the parents of the child was pending should not exercise ancillary jurisdiction under Article 3 (c) even if under the local law of the court such ancillary jurisdiction was given. [read post]
3 May 2016, 12:09 am
Bacterial growth is inhibited by refrigeration below 4° C., heating above 121° C, and high water-activity or acidity. [read post]
2 May 2016, 8:54 pm
[Lots of notices b/c lots of internet!] [read post]
2 May 2016, 11:44 am
Maphalle, University of Cape Town (South Africa)· Judicial Protection of Women’s Matrimonial Property Rights in NigeriaAnthony C. [read post]
2 May 2016, 10:03 am
Já foram capazes de alterar algumas partes do relatório para melhor, mas outros pontos ainda são muito ruins. [read post]
2 May 2016, 3:32 am
.** Arnold J at appellate level - EPO news and a timely decision for World IP DayArnold J agrees with the Court of Appeal decision in Richter Gedeon Vegyeszeti Gyar RT v Generics, and a patent directed to a dosage regime for levonorgestrel as a method of emergency contraception remains obvious.** House Passes Defend Trade Secrets ActAmerikat Annsley reports on the new federal legal protection for Trade Secrets in the US.** Publishing and the MachineNeil Wilkof explores how… [read post]
1 May 2016, 1:49 pm
Then Defendants argue that their name, “Moschino,” falls into the exception of Section 1202(c), as “personally identifying information about the user of a work”. [read post]
1 May 2016, 4:32 am
This was the third question asked by the French Cour de cassation, as reformulated by the CJEU, that this same court had to answer: “By its third question in Case C‑236/08, its second question in Case C‑237/08 and its third question in Case C‑238/08, the Cour de cassation asks, in essence, whether Article 14 of Directive 2000/31 is to be interpreted as meaning that an internet referencing service constitutes an information society service consisting… [read post]
1 May 2016, 1:00 am
McDonald (by her litigation friend Duncan J McDonald) v McDonald & Ors, heard 15-16 March 2016. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 4:04 am
The case was referred to the Court of Justice of the European Union (C‑406/10), which similarly ruled that computer languages are functional and therefore not protected by copyright. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 11:29 am
The Calgary Herald argued that sections 4(3)(c) and 4(3)(k) of PIPA meant that PIPA would not apply to these activities. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 8:00 am
Her attorneys were David J. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 7:53 am
Nancy J. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 6:46 am
Brown, Gerald J. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 5:30 am
Dec. 9, 2015 Green, J.), the court approved summary judgment in favor of a Defendant in a case where the Plaintiff did not identify the correct Defendant driver involved in the accident. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
Attorney and AuthorCopyright Litigation Handbook (Thomson Reuters Westlaw 2015-2016) by Raymond J. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
Attorney and AuthorCopyright Litigation Handbook (Thomson Reuters Westlaw 2015-2016) by Raymond J. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
Attorney and AuthorCopyright Litigation Handbook (Thomson Reuters Westlaw 2015-2016) by Raymond J. [read post]
