Search for: "MATTER OF A E" Results 6981 - 7000 of 37,760
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2020, 3:17 am by SHG
No details matter enough to undo their outrage, so there is no rational discussion to talk them off the cliff. [read post]
29 Aug 2020, 1:15 pm by Eugene Volokh
If the use-mention distinction doesn't matter for oral statements, why should it matter for written ones? [read post]
29 Aug 2020, 12:40 pm by Michael Lowe
”  The Texas Commission on Human Rights Act (TCHRA) does not provide the exclusive remedy for sexual harassment in these assault matters and does not preempt a plaintiff’s common law assault claim. [read post]
29 Aug 2020, 11:51 am by Eugene Volokh
You can read the details of the UCI controversy in this Reddit post and this Above The Law post, but here's the heart of the matter. [read post]
29 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by Chris Seaton
§ 39-14-414 from a Class A Misdemeanor to a Class E Felony. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 12:48 pm by Nina Skinner
For questions about these developments or assistance with any other private placement matters, please contact Nina Bianchi Skinner. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 12:48 pm by Liskow & Lewis
For questions about these developments or assistance with any other private placement matters, please contact Nina Bianchi Skinner. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 12:33 pm by Monica Williamson
To obtain a Lummi Indian Business Council (LIBC) application go to:  https://www.lummi-nsn.gov/widgets/JobsNow.php or request by e-mail libchr@lummi-nsn.gov. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 6:11 am
Bebchuk and Roberto Tallarita (discussed on the Forum here); Toward Fair and Sustainable Capitalism by Leo E. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 6:11 pm by Russell Knight
So, it becomes more functional and efficient to deal with both matters in the same clause. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 3:17 pm by Sheila R. Carroll
[5] The definition encompasses a “family office” as defined in the “family office rule” [17 CFR § 275.202(a)(11)(G)-1] that meets the following additional requirements: (i) it has at least $5 million in assets under management, (ii) it is not formed for the specific purpose of acquiring the securities offered, and (iii) its prospective investment is directed by a person who has such knowledge and experience in financial and busines matters that such family… [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 1:40 pm by Michael S. Levine and Meagan R. Cyrus
However, the court glossed over such analogous cases involving disease-causing agents such as E. coli, ammonia, and asbestos, where those courts found the existence of physical loss. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 1:04 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In more recent years, the concepts of “stakeholders” and “stakeholder interests” have greatly expanded, with the interests generally falling under the umbrella of environmental, social and governance (ESG) matters. [2] Now current and ongoing events, including the COVID-19 pandemic and the increased attention to systemic racism following the killing of George Floyd, add new and increasing complexity for boards of directors as they consider stakeholder interests in… [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 12:22 pm by Eugene Volokh
This matter came up on another thread, so I thought I'd briefly discuss it in more detail. [read post]
The Blog/Web Site should not be used as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state regarding a particular matter. [read post]
The Blog/Web Site should not be used as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state regarding a particular matter. [read post]
As a matter of fact, the increase in the demand for certain products, the difficulties in the production and distribution due to anti-COVID measures, caused certain companies to necessitate some form of cooperation to avoid shortages of essential goods. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 10:35 am by Arthur F. Coon
Slipped into a footnote was the Court’s sharp rebuttal to one of the County’s rehearing arguments in which it disclaimed a position attributed to it in the original opinion: “In a rehearing petition, the County insists that it has never claimed it may destroy e-mails described in section 21167.6. [read post]