Search for: "MRS v. State" Results 6981 - 7000 of 21,763
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2016, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
  The claim was dismissed, the judge finding that the defence of “truth” was made out because Mr Begg was an extremist Islamic speaker who had promoted and encouraged religious violence. [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 5:23 am by INFORRM
Scarlet v Sabam decided in 2011 is limited to situations in which the data controller is the Internet Service Provider (ISP) itself. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 11:36 pm by Tessa Shepperson
Burning the candle at more than one end and not recreational v. work either, just work of various kinds. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
When Mr Booker says that M’s financial resources have been seized by the British State, he is probably referring to the fact that the court has ordered M’s affairs should be managed by the Official Solicitor NOT Mrs Kirk, who the court evidently does not feel is capable of acting in M’s best interests, despite her belief that she is doing just that. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 9:58 pm by David Cheifetz
It’s small, in light of his other issues, but Donald Trump is once again embroiled in litigation, albeit outside of the United States, which may result in findings against him of at least negligent misrepresentation sufficient to produce personal liability: see Singh v Trump et al, 2016 ONCA 747 (CanLII), <http://canlii.ca/t/gv3z7>. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 3:57 am by Edith Roberts
” In Education Week, Mark Walsh takes a look at Fry v. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 5:46 pm by Kenneth Vercammen, Esq.
Medical expenses can be deducted in the inheritance tax.Under United States Supreme Court Case, Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc., v. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 2:35 am
While this moggy was struggling to get back from Indonesia, the Court of Appeal handed down its decision in the pregabalin appeal Warner-Lambert Company LLC v Generics (UK) Ltd (t/a Mylan) & Ors [2016] EWCA Civ 1006 (13 October 2016), and finally the IPKat has managed to blog about it (the lateness by no means reflecting on the importance of the judgment).It is very much a judgment of three halves.In the first part of the judgment (up to [135]), which substantively disposes of the… [read post]