Search for: "Pass v. State"
Results 6981 - 7000
of 28,441
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2019, 7:42 pm
Synopsys, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:57 am
In the past, many have observed anecdotally and cynically that even after many years of deliberation and millions of dollars in legal and expert fees often expended, the tariff at the end of the day has often the simple arithmetical average of the amounts proposed by the proponent and opponent(s) +/– a few percent.However, that pattern, if it was ever true, has been changing and the Board has issued some surprising and encouraging decision. in recent yearsThe Board has refused to set… [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 8:36 am
Last month, the military commission for the matter of United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 7:02 am
Halchak v Dorrance Township Board of Supervisors, 2019 WL 4794773 (MD PA 8/30/2019) [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 7:00 am
Consider Yick Wo v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 3:56 am
” At The Regulatory Review, law student Tim Duncheon outlines why, in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 3:52 am
In short: no trade, no trademark.Two US Court of Appeals opinions have created the possibility that a plaintiff could bring a passing-off action based on use of its trademark outside of the United States only – a powerful new tool for challenging infringers that are first to use the trademark in the United StatesFollowing the Supreme Court’s 2014 decision in Lexmark International, Inc v Static Control Components, Inc (572 US ___, 134 S Ct 1377 (2014)),… [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
Under Addington v. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 11:06 am
It is time for the United States to stop debating whether to address it, and start talking about how to address it. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
In Geduldig v. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 10:17 am
See also State v. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 5:35 am
The version of the bill that passed into law contained the “if any” language. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 5:00 am
In the case of Corey v. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 1:34 am
” In a welcome development, the CA backed the approach of Laddie J (“a judge with prolific expertise in the law of copyright”) in Cala Homes v Alfred McAlpine [1995] FSR 818 at p.835 over the narrower one of Lightman J in Robin Ray v Classic FM [1998] FSR 622 at [27]-[28]. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 12:15 am
Facebook is unhappy about the CJEU’s recent decision in Glawischnig-Piesczek v Facebook Ireland Ltd (C 18/18), which held that the social media company could be ordered by member states to remove equivalent content, worldwide when content is deemed illegal in a member state. [read post]
20 Oct 2019, 9:05 pm
Circuit affirmed the Obama Administration FCC’s changed regulatory classification in United States Telecom Association v. [read post]
20 Oct 2019, 1:59 am
As readers know, this is a profoundly un-harmonized area of the law, and different approaches are in place across different EU Member States. [read post]
19 Oct 2019, 8:09 am
Supreme Court case, Batson v. [read post]
19 Oct 2019, 5:21 am
United States. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 4:24 pm
In her statement to the Commons, the Secretary of State said [with added links]: Protecting children is at the heart of our online harms agenda, and is key to wider Government priorities. [read post]
