Search for: "People v. Grant"
Results 6981 - 7000
of 16,995
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2016, 9:26 am
In Lee v. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 6:39 am
” (Judge Kavanaugh also dismissed as “absurd” and lacking precedent the dissent’s argument that “the war powers clauses grant Congress authority to establish military commissions but not to specify which offenses may be tried by military commission. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 1:39 pm
Of his vote in Schenck v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 11:31 am
” The case is Murray Energy Corporation, et al., v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 10:00 am
The “this” in question is an interesting little twist in litigation over an attorney fee award to plaintiff’s counsel in the long running ERISA litigation, Frommert v. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 12:12 pm
See People v Helt. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 8:44 am
However, on March 7, 2011, the Supreme Court granted certiorari and the case was heard on October 5, 2011 (by this point the case was known as Golan v. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 8:01 am
’ (People v. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 8:35 am
Spy Phone Labs LLC. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 7:07 am
Latimer, National Law Review More Blog Entries: Grant v. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 7:02 am
District of Columbia v. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 4:58 am
” At First Mondays (podcast), Ian Samuel and Dan Epps discuss court-related news from last week, including Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s comments about NFL players’ refusals to stand for the national anthem, the week’s oral arguments and new grants, and the court’s per curiam opinion in Bosse v. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 12:43 pm
See Synopsys,Inc. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 9:10 am
Murphy v. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 6:24 am
I grant you: In that race, Trump is the better choice, the lesser of two evils. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 4:36 am
” In The Atlantic, Garrett Epps discusses Hasty v. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 4:08 pm
People should think about their own conduct. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 1:52 pm
What is less clear is whether they are people who have proved the abusive behaviour or who merely assert it. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 9:43 am
Inadmissibility Series I: INA 212(a)(2)(D)(i) Prostitution Inadmissibility Series INA 212– Part V 212(a)(2)(D)(i) Section 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 lists a series of classes of foreign nationals who are inadmissible to the United States. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 11:34 am
The main authority on this question was the Court of Justice of the European Union case of UsedSoft GmbH v Oracle International (C‑128/11). [read post]
